News & Analysis as of

Labor Code › Standing › Employees

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

PAGA Paraphrased – Osuna v. Spectrum Security Services, Inc.

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The Second District Court of Appeal held that, under the pre-reform PAGA statute, an individual employee need not have been employed or experienced a Labor Code violation during the one-year PAGA limitations period to have...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

PAGA Paraphrased — Rodriguez v. Lawrence Equip., Inc.

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The Second District again held that issue preclusion barred plaintiff’s PAGA claim because he failed to establish any violation of the Labor Code and arbitral findings have a preclusive effect on a plaintiff’s standing in a...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

PAGA Paraphrased – Balderas v. Fresh Start Harvesting, Inc.

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The Second District, following Adolph and not Viking River, confirms that a PAGA plaintiff does not lose standing to pursue a PAGA claim if they “did not file an individual cause of action seeking individual relief.”...more

Meyers Nave

PAGA Standing and Arbitration: What California Employers Need to Know Now That the California Supreme Court Has Spoken

Meyers Nave on

On July 17, 2023, the California Supreme Court issued its decision in Adolph v. Uber Technologies, Inc. With this decision California employers need to understand that plaintiffs do not lose standing when individual...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide