News & Analysis as of

Lanham Act › Patent Litigation › False Advertising

BakerHostetler

Patent Law Meets Ad Law: Legal Risks of Using ‘Patented,’ ‘Proprietary’ or ‘Exclusive’ in Marketing Claims

BakerHostetler on

As a reformed patent attorney, I’m always excited to explore issues that bridge patent law and advertising law. Patent issues occasionally arise in the ad tech space, especially around innovations in programmatic advertising,...more

Irwin IP LLP

Paws vs. Jaws: Dawgs Take on Crocs in The Federal Circuit

Irwin IP LLP on

Crocs, Inc. v. Effervescent, Inc., No. 1:06-cv-00605 (Fed. Cir. October 3, 2024) - On October 3, 2024, the Federal Circuit held that a party may be liable for false advertising violations under Section 43(a)(1)(B) of the...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Judge Noreika Denies Defendants’ Motion for Attorneys’ Fees In Alleged Patent Infringement Action

Fox Rothschild LLP on

By Memorandum Opinion entered by The Honorable Maryellen Noreika in Mixing & Mass Transfer Technologies, LLC v. SPX Corporation et al., Civil Action No. 19-529-MN (D.Del. November 4, 2020), the Court denied the SPX...more

Akerman LLP - Marks, Works & Secrets

FLANAX: Protecting Foreign Marks from US Unfair Competition Under Section 43(a)

Akerman LLP - Marks, Works & Secrets on

In today’s increasingly global economy, trademark owners are more frequently butting up against the territorial limitations of trademark law. It has long been a matter of black letter law that trademark rights are...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide