News & Analysis as of

Layoffs › Unions › Notice Requirements

Littler

Ohio Enacts Mini-WARN Act Requiring Notice Components in Addition to Federal WARN

Littler on

On July 1, 2025, Ohio Governor Mike DeWine signed House Bill No. 96, most of which related to the state’s operating budget for fiscal year 2026-2027. However, the bill also added a new code section that includes a state...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

No Small Thing: Mini-Warn Act Comes to Washington State

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Washington is the latest state to enact a “mini-WARN” Act that will require employers with 50 or more full-time employees to provide at least 60 days’ notice to the state as well as any union or employees affected by a...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

I’m WARNing You… Maybe? Bankruptcy Court Considers Exception to Layoff Notice Statute

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

The federal Worker Adjustment Retraining Notification Act (the WARN Act), generally requires that employers give workers 60 days’ written notice of any plant closings or mass layoffs. If employers do not comply with this...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Spain Introduces New Obligation to Notify Unions Six Months in Advance of Workplace Closures

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

The Spanish government has introduced Royal Decree 608/2023, a new employment law that requires any company closing operations to notify trade unions, autonomous community labour authorities, and the central government six...more

BCLP

PRC Legal Update: Termination of Employment in China and Issues to Note during Covid-19 Pandemic

BCLP on

Termination of employment by employers in China is virtually never easy even in absence of a crisis situation. When it comes to the economic downturn, employee dismissal becomes far more sensitive....more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

California Employers Be WARNED: California WARN Act Applies to Temporary Layoffs

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

In a recent decision, a California Court of Appeal ruled for the first time that a temporary layoff is sufficient to trigger the protections of the California WARN Act (“Cal WARN”). In Int’l Brotherhood of Boilermakers, Iron...more

BCLP

You’ve Been Warned: California’s WARN Act Is Broader Than the Federal Warn Act

BCLP on

As with so many other situations involving California’s employment laws, its protection for California-based employees experiencing a job loss is broader than the protections under federal law. In The International...more

Fisher Phillips

California’s WARN Act Applies to Temporary Layoffs

Fisher Phillips on

A California appellate court has ruled that California’s WARN Act, which requires 60 days advance notice of “mass layoffs,” applies to temporary layoffs and furloughs. The case (Boilermakers Local 1998 v. Nassco Holdings,...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Short-Term Layoffs Require Advance Notice Under California WARN

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: Like the Federal WARN Act, California’s WARN Act (Cal-WARN) requires employers to notify employees of certain covered layoffs that will affect them. The California Court of Appeal has now confirmed that...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide