News & Analysis as of

Litigation Strategies Standing Privacy Laws

Husch Blackwell LLP

U.S. Privacy Litigation Update: June 2025 Decisions

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In this post: (1) Website tracking litigation risk remains as SB 690 is designated “two-year bill”; (2) Second Circuit reinforces narrower interpretation of PII to “shut the door for Pixel-based VPPA claims”; (3) Courts...more

Snell & Wilmer

Northern District of California Underscores Futility of Certain CIPA “Trap and Trace” Class Actions

Snell & Wilmer on

The Northern District of California recently dismissed, with prejudice, a purported class action against Royal Caribbean Cruises Ltd. (Royal Caribbean), alleging a violation of the California Invasion of Privacy Act (CIPA)...more

Kilpatrick

California federal court bemoans choice of unfit plaintiffs in denial of class certification motion

Kilpatrick on

When a court begins its order denying class certification by lamenting the “failure to properly vet named plaintiffs” and “seeming unwillingness to promptly address issues that arise during litigation with named plaintiffs”...more

Hogan Lovells

California’s evolving standing jurisprudence provides companies with a key defense in response to a wave of privacy claims

Hogan Lovells on

Over the last several years, California appellate courts have begun to align the threshold standing analysis under California law with the federal Article III standing requirements, presenting an emergingly viable...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide