News & Analysis as of

Manufacturers › Design Defects › Negligence

Goldberg Segalla

California Jury Returns Asbestos Verdict For Auto Parts Companies

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Calif. Super., Los Angeles Co. - Plaintiff, Ronald Carpenter, filed suit against various defendants, claiming his lung cancer was caused by exposure to asbestos from their products. Carpenter alleged various exposures,...more

McCarter & English, LLP

Artificial Intelligence & Product Liability

McCarter & English, LLP on

As federal agencies and states grapple with regulating artificial intelligence (AI) to enhance its safety profile, and as businesses race to adopt AI for myriad purposes, it is important to recognize a general safety...more

Miles Mediation & Arbitration

Rising Complexity Across Global Supply Chains is Exacerbating Product Liability Risks

Miles Mediation & Arbitration on

Whether an individual is purchasing a new car, a new television, or a new kitchen appliance, the company that makes those products isn’t the only manufacturer involved. In today’s global economy, most products are made by an...more

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley

Can I Sue for a Faulty Product?

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley on

Although “faulty” doesn’t necessarily mean “defective” or “dangerous,” product liability law does indeed hold manufacturers and others liable for producing dangerous products that cause injury. Product liability claims in...more

BCLP

Georgia's Apportionment Statute in Product Liability Lawsuits

BCLP on

The Georgia Supreme Court recently issued a decision impacting all product liability cases in Georgia by finding that Georgia’s apportionment statute—O.C.G.A. § 51-12-33—applies to claims for strict product liability, and as...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Florida Appellate Court Authorizes the Use of the Risk-Utility Test in Complex Medical Device Cases

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On October 7, 2020, Florida’s Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a defense verdict in favor of a medical device manufacturer and in doing so approved of the trial court’s use of the risk-utility test and not the...more

White and Williams LLP

California Supreme Court Holds That Evidence of Industry Custom and Practice May Be Admissible in a Design Defect, Strict Product...

White and Williams LLP on

In Kim v. Toyota Motor Corp., 6 Cal.5th 21 (Cal. 2018), the Supreme Court of California considered whether the trial court properly allowed the defendant to introduce evidence of industry custom and practice in defense of a...more

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP

Product Liability: 2017 Year in Review

Nutter McClennen & Fish LLP on

Massachusetts state and federal courts issued a number of important product liability decisions in 2017. The Product Liability and Toxic Tort Litigation Group at Nutter recently reviewed these cases. Highlighted below are...more

Sands Anderson PC

Court Excludes Evidence Developed Through Plaintiff’s Surreptitious Contact with Corporate Defendant’s Employees

Sands Anderson PC on

On March 27, 2015, Jalal Haidar brought suit in federal court, alleging that he had been injured by a dangerous condition in a hotel. According to Haidar, he sat motionless on a hotel toilet for approximately fifteen seconds...more

CMCP - California Minority Counsel Program

Strict Products Liability Claims Based On Design Defect Are Inapplicable To Implanted Medical Devices That Are Available Only...

CMCP - California Minority Counsel Program on

A recent California Court of Appeal decision out of the Second District has provided further clarity to the scope of California products liability law by reasserting the general rule that precludes strict liability for design...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide