News & Analysis as of

Manufacturers › Strict Product Liability › Summary Judgment

White and Williams LLP

A Matter of Circumstance: New York Court Finds Circumstantial Evidence Enough

White and Williams LLP on

In State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. a/s/o Miriam Perez v. Pentair Flow Techs., LLC No. 7:21-CV-6679, 2025 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36875, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (District Court) reconsidered...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Products Liability Series: Does a Supplier of a Defective Product Have Recourse Against a Manufacturer?

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,... on

Does a supplier of a defective product have recourse against a manufacturer? Yes. By statute, Arkansas has created indemnification rights accruing in favor of product suppliers. When a supplier of a defective product is not...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

“Alternative Avenues” Argument in Failure-to-Warn Cases Adding an Additional Wrinkle to Medical Device Litigation

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

A developing line of cases across the nation may have large implications for medical device manufacturers defending against failure-to-warn claims. While a treating physician’s failure to read or rely on the manufacturer’s...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Florida Product Liability Law: 4th DCA Affirms Summary Judgment with Key Holdings for Manufacturers

Rumberger | Kirk on

On June 15, 2022, the Fourth DCA issued its opinion in Michael Grieco v. Daiho Sangyo., Inc., AW Distributing, Inc., and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP affirming entry of summary judgment in favor of the manufacturer, distributor...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide