News & Analysis as of

Medical Malpractice Discovery

Holland & Hart LLP

Navigating Utah's Expanded Peer Review Privilege: A Roadmap for Healthcare Providers

Holland & Hart LLP on

The term “peer review privilege” generally refers to a discovery and evidentiary privilege that can be asserted by hospitals and other healthcare entities to protect the confidentiality of credentialing, quality improvement,...more

Marshall Dennehey

Proposed Expert’s Qualification to Proffer Standard of Care Opinions Must Be Evaluated Under the Entirety of Section 512 of the...

Marshall Dennehey on

Key Points: Standard of Care: Patient assessment and discussion of procedures to be performed to evaluate the patient prior to surgery fall under the purview of the standard of care, not informed consent....more

Marshall Dennehey

Pennsylvania Superior Court Affirms Dismissal of Medical Negligence Claims Due to Insufficient Evidence

Marshall Dennehey on

Vandever v. Stair, 2025 WL 523863 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2025) - The Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld the dismissal of a medical negligence claim against a physician, finding that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient...more

Marshall Dennehey

Strategies for Combatting Reptile Theory in Medical Malpractice Trials

Marshall Dennehey on

The Reptile Theory is a litigation strategy intended to activate jurors’ survival instincts during trial and is designed to induce fear over logic and reason when hearing a case. Rather than focusing on the standard of care...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Supreme Court of Ohio Decides on a Peer-Review Privilege Issue in Stull v. Summa

Epstein Becker & Green on

On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from discovery the file the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Supreme Court of Ohio Rules on a Peer-Review Privilege Issue in Stull v. Summa

Epstein Becker & Green on

Background - On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from...more

Marshall Dennehey

Pennsylvania Superior Court Finds the Treatment of a Dog Bite Undeniably “Arises Out of” the Dog Bite and Medical Negligence...

Marshall Dennehey on

Early v. Patient First Medical Group, et al., 311 A.3d 608 (Pa. Super. Dec. 26, 2023) - The plaintiff was bitten by a dog and treated by the defendants. She later filed a medical malpractice action against the providers who...more

Searcy Denney Scarola Barnhart & Shipley

Request for Production: What it Means for Your Personal Injury Case

Many people are aware that if they are injured due to someone’s negligence in a car accident, slip and fall incident, medical malpractice, or other situations, an experienced personal injury attorney can file a legal claim to...more

White and Williams LLP

PA Superior Court Imposes Heavy Burden on Defendants to Challenge Propriety of Venue

White and Williams LLP on

Efforts by defendants to challenge venue in Philadelphia took another backwards step this week when the Superior Court of Pennsylvania reversed a Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas’ order transferring venue to Bucks County....more

Marshall Dennehey

A Hospital’s Metadata is Subject to Inspection in New Jersey Medical Malpractice Matters

Marshall Dennehey on

Key Points: New Jersey’s Appellate Division held that an inspection of a hospital’s electronic medical records, including its metadata, is discoverable despite the risks and burdens of producing such information for review....more

Morris James LLP

How Long Does It Take to Resolve a Medical Malpractice Claim?

Morris James LLP on

Medical malpractice claims are complex legal claims that often involve traumatic personal stories and complicated medical and legal issues. Every claim is different, and one unique fact in a case can have a significant impact...more

Nossaman LLP

California’s New Apology Law and Its Impact on Peer Review Hearings

Nossaman LLP on

Parties in peer review hearings can present a wide range of relevant evidence, regardless of its admissibility in a court of law.  But California has passed a new “apology law” that modifies that standard, erecting a...more

Polsinelli

Different Committee, Different Scope: Delaware Court Holds Credentials Committee Documents May Be Subject to Discovery

Polsinelli on

Deborah Palmer (“Plaintiff”), as the surviving spouse of Vance Palmer (“Mr. Palmer”), brought multiple claims against defendants Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. (“Hospital”) and neurosurgeon Bikash Bose, M.D. (“Dr....more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

New York Court Rules to Affect Medical Malpractice Motions

Chief Administrative Judge Lawrence K. Mark’s December 29, 2020 Administrative Order includes several new rules that will be extended from the Commercial Division to other civil courts, including Supreme Court, the...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

$50M Jury Verdict Overturned on Appeal Because Evidence of Autism Excluded at Trial: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois...

Did a trial court err in excluding evidence of subsequent formal diagnosis of autism when potentially alternative cause of current condition of minor? Julien Florez v. Northshore University Healthsystem d/b/a Evanston...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

Dispositive Motions Should Proceed Only After Expert Discovery Completed: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois Medical...

What is the appropriate time for filing a dispositive motion in medical malpractice actions? Schicheng Guo, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Shinqian Bao, deceased v. International Teleradiology, LLC, Swedish...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Health Care

Plaintiff Permitted to Redesignate Rule 213(f)(3) Controlled Expert to Consultant: Hinshaw's Annual Guide to Key Illinois Medical...

Issue - Can a party who has disclosed a physician as a controlled expert witness pursuant to 213(f)(3) later redesignate that expert as a consultant pursuant to Rule 213(b)(3)? Alexis Dameron v. Mercy Hospital and Medical...more

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Md. High Court to Defendants: Don’t Show Up Empty Handed When Using the “Empty Chair” Defense

The “empty chair” defense, where the defendant denies responsibility for the plaintiff’s injuries and blames a person absent from trial (i.e. the “empty chair”), can be extremely effective in tort actions. The Court of...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Texas Court of Appeals Reaffirms Key Principles Concerning the Medical Peer Review Privilege

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Introduction - A recent decision by a Texas Court of Appeals reaffirms several important principles regarding the medical peer review privilege: (1) communications arguably covered by the peer review privilege need not be...more

Baker Donelson

At the Crossroads: Legal Considerations Where Government Investigations Overlap with Tort Risk in Long Term Care

Baker Donelson on

In roughly the seventh week after a majority of states and the federal government issued emergency declarations or "lock down" executive orders, the true impact of COVID-19 is only beginning to be fully transparent. In long...more

NAM (National Arbitration and Mediation)

Resolving Medical Malpractice Matters - Positive Outcomes Through Mediation

There are numerous benefits associated with using mediation to resolve medical malpractice disputes. The mediation process affords both parties more control over the process, often reduces the cost of litigation, and can...more

White and Williams LLP

PA Superior Court Holds Attorney-Client Communications in Divorce Records are Discoverable in Medical Malpractice Case

White and Williams LLP on

On September 23, 2019, the Pennsylvania Superior Court in Corey v. Wilkes-Barre General Hospital held that divorce records, including attorney-client communications, were discoverable. The Superior Court’s decision in Corey...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Morris v. Muniz: A Sword Against Whom?

Rumberger | Kirk on

Until recently, there had been confusion regarding the application of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “Act”) as it pertains to (1) the proper appellate standard of review of a presuit expert’s qualifications, and (2)...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Have Another Bite at the Respondent in Discovery Apple: Illinois Appellate Courts Allow Plaintiffs to File an Amended Complaint...

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On March 23, 2018, the Second District of the Illinois Appellate Court joined the First District in allowing plaintiffs to invoke the Illinois’ Respondent in Discovery Statute (735 ILCS 5/2-402) to file an amended complaint...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Florida Supreme Court Says Right to Privacy Survives Death and Prohibits Ex Parte Interviews in Medmal Actions

Rumberger | Kirk on

In the case of Weaver v. Myers, a sharply divided Florida Supreme Court recently struck down part of the 2013 amendments to Fla. Stats. §§766.106 and 766.1065, which govern the informal discovery process of the medical...more

36 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide