News & Analysis as of

Medicare › Evidence › Medical Expenses

Snell & Wilmer

Redefining the Rules: How Audish v. Macias Reshaped Future Medical Expense Claims in California Personal Injury Cases

Snell & Wilmer on

In Audish v. Macias (2024) 102 Cal.App.5th 740, the California Court of Appeal decided a key issue concerning the admissibility of a plaintiff’s future Medicare eligibility in calculating damages for future medical expense...more

Tyson & Mendes LLP

Audish v. Macias Builds Upon the Foundation Started in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provision, Inc.

Tyson & Mendes LLP on

Earlier this year, the Fourth District Court of Appeal decided Audish v. Macias. This groundbreaking case builds upon the foundation started in Howell v. Hamilton Meats & Provision, Inc. by clarifying the application of the...more

Marshall Dennehey

Plaintiff Does Not Have to Pay for It and Neither Should You: Preventing Plaintiff’s Introduction of Past Medical Expenses that...

Marshall Dennehey on

Key Points: Evidence of past medical bill charges that have been paid, adjusted, or written off are not relevant. Florida case law establishes that Medicare/Medicaid recipients are precluded from showing evidence of medical...more

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP

Dial v. Calusa Palms Master Association, Inc. - Florida Supreme Court Confirms Only Amounts Actually Paid By Medicare Are...

Butler Weihmuller Katz Craig LLP on

On April 28, 2022, the Florida Supreme Court issued its decision in Dial v. Calusa Palms Master Association, Inc., which addressed the question: DOES THE HOLDING IN JOERG V. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE CO., 176...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide