News & Analysis as of

Merck Pharmaceutical Patents Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

Venable LLP

Spotlight On: Lantus® / Lantus® SoloSTAR® (insulin glargine recombinant) / Basaglar® (insulin glargine) / Semglee® (insulin...

Venable LLP on

Insulin Glargine Challenged Claim Types in IPR and Litigation: Claims include those challenged in litigations and IPRs. Claims are counted in each litigation and IPR, so claims from the same patent challenged in multiple...more

Goodwin

PTAB Institutes Eight More IPRs Filed by Merck on Johns Hopkins Pembrolizumab Patents

Goodwin on

​​​​​​​In the last few weeks, the PTAB has granted institution of eight IPRs filed by Merck on Johns Hopkins patents directed to methods of treatment using pembrolizumab. The eight patents are generally directed to methods...more

Goodwin

Update on John Hopkins and Merck Pembrolizumab Litigation

Goodwin on

In a decision that issued last week, a Patent Trial and Appeal Board (“PTAB”) panel instituted inter partes review (“IPR”) of a petition filed by Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC (“Merck”) for a patent owned by The Johns Hopkins...more

Venable LLP

Four Additional IPRs Filed by Merck Challenging The Johns Hopkins University Pembrolizumab Patents

Venable LLP on

On March 13, 2024, Merck Sharp & Dohme, LLC (“Merck”) filed four additional IPRs challenging The Johns Hopkins University (“JHU”) patents covering methods of treatment using pembrolizumab, which Merck sells under the trade...more

BakerHostetler

Federal Circuit Develops the ‘At Once Envisage’ Standard of Anticipation and Affirms the Importance of Specialized Considerations...

BakerHostetler on

Anticipation of a claim generally requires that a single prior art reference explicitly discloses each and every claim element. However, absent an express teaching in the prior art, a claim may also be anticipated if it is...more

Goodwin

New IPR Petitions Filed Against GSK Vaccine Process Patents

Goodwin on

Yesterday, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. filed four IPR petitions (IPR2018-01229, IPR2018-01236, IPR2018-01234, and IPR2018-01237) against GlaxoSmithKline process patents – US Patent Nos. 8,753,645 and 9,265,839. The ‘645 and...more

Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt PC

Fresh From the Bench: Latest Federal Circuit Court Cases

Berkheimer v. HP Inc., Appeal No. 2017-1437 (Fed. Cir. Feb. 8, 2018) - In Berkheimer v. HP Inc., the Federal Circuit reviewed the District Court’s summary judgment finding that certain claims of a patent were invalid as...more

Goodwin

Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Genentech Jointly Move to Terminate Cabilly IPR

Goodwin on

Merck Sharpe & Dohme and Genentech have filed a Joint Motion to Terminate IPR2016-00710, relating to U.S. Patent No. 6,331,415. As we reported earlier, the ‘415 patent is known as one of the “Cabilly” patents, and is...more

Goodwin

Breaking News: PTAB Grants One Petition and Denies Another for Review of Genentech’s Cabilly Patent

Goodwin on

Merck Sharp & Dohme filed two petitions for inter partes review of Genentech’s U.S. Patent 6,331,415, one of the “Cabilly Patent,” which claims processes and materials broadly applicable to recombinant antibody manufacturing....more

Goodwin

IPR Tracker: IPR2016-01373 (U.S. Patent No. 6,331,415) (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp.) (Cabilly II Patent) – Petition for IPR

Goodwin on

Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. has filed an IPR petition on U.S. Patent No. 6,331,415. This patent has been challenged several times over the past year with mixed results: IPR2015-01624 (instituted); IPR2016-00383 (not...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

IP Newsflash - March 2016

DISTRICT COURT CASES - New York Court Invalidates Targeted-Advertising Patents under Alice - A federal judge in the Southern District of New York granted counterclaim-defendant TNS’s motion for summary judgment...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB's IPR Decision Invalidating A Pharmaceutical Patent

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On December 17, 2015, in Merck v. Gnosis, the Federal Circuit affirmed the PTAB’s IPR Decision finding a pharmaceutical patent invalid for obviousness. Justice Newman vigorously dissented from the majority’s view (Justices...more

12 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide