News & Analysis as of

Misleading Statements

BakerHostetler

[Podcast] AD Nauseam: I Want to Break Free – Free Claims!!

BakerHostetler on

In this episode of AD Nauseam, Amy Mudge and Daniel Kaufman explore the complexities of advertising “free” offers, emphasizing the importance of transparency and compliance with FTC guidelines. They discuss how the term...more

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

TikTok’s Motion to Dismiss Denied by NY State Court

New York Attorney General Letitia James and 13 other Attorneys General filed suit in October 2024 against TikTok “for misleading the public about the safety of its platform and harming young people’s mental health.” TikTok...more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Stay ADvised: 2025, Issue 11

Native Deodorant False Ad Dismissed As Court Finds Plaintiff's Contradictions Don't Pass the Smell Test - A proposed class action alleging that Native Deodorant falsely advertises its "natural" deodorant as offering...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Dismisses Class Action Against Social Media Company

A&O Shearman on

On May 19, 2025, Judge Edward J. Davila of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California dismissed without prejudice a proposed securities fraud class action asserting claims against a social...more

Gardner Law

FDA’s Latest Untitled Letter: An Enforcement Tell?

Gardner Law on

FDA’s Office of Prescription Drug Promotion (OPDP) is active throughout each year issuing letters challenging promotional labeling they deem noncompliant. Any communication from FDA regarding a promotional claim they disagree...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

Licorice Sticks and New York’s General Business Law

Freiberger Haber LLP on

In Libman v. Hershey Co., 2025 N.Y. Slip Op. 31769(U), (Sup. Ct., N.Y. County May 5, 2025) (here), the motion court was asked to consider whether a front-of-the-package label on the Twizzlers candy wrapper violated General...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

NAD Finds Advertiser Responsible for Influencer Post it Didn’t Request

A beauty influencer posted a video on TikTok that purported to show how Huda Beauty’s Easy Bake Setting Spray is stronger and lasts longer than Charlotte Tilbury Beauty’s competing spray. Huda reposted the video on its...more

A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Dismisses Securities Class Action Against Biopharmaceutical Company For Failure To Adequately...

A&O Shearman on

On May 5, 2025, Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss a proposed class action asserting claims against a biopharmaceutical company...more

Mintz - Antitrust Viewpoints

Trump Repeals Biden AI Chip Controls and FTC Scrutinizes AI Claims — AI: The Washington Report

On May 7, the Trump administration announced plans to rescind a Biden-era AI chip export control rule and replace it with a new rule. “The Biden AI rule is overly complex, overly bureaucratic and would stymie American...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Federal Trade Commission Orders accessiBe to Pay $1M For Misleading Claims Relating to Automated Website Accessibility Remediation...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The FTC issued a Decision and Order prohibiting accessibility plug-in/Widget vendor AccessiBe from making misleading claims and to pay $1 million....more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

Stay ADvised: 2025, Issue 10

Turns Out That Goldfish "No Artificial Flavors or Preservatives" Claim Was a Red Herring, New York Federal Court Says - A federal court in the Southern District of New York found that Veronika Ward, the plaintiff in a...more

A&O Shearman

Central District Of California Dismisses Putative Securities Class Action Against Healthcare Technology Company For Failure To...

A&O Shearman on

On April 18, 2025, Judge André Birotte Jr. of the Central District of California granted a motion to dismiss a putative class action asserting claims under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the...more

Fishman Haygood LLP

Plaintiff Counsel’s Mid-Trial Social Media Post Results in Reversal of Jury Verdict in Illinois Court of Appeals

Fishman Haygood LLP on

An Illinois appellate court recently reversed a $43 million jury verdict in a personal injury case (Kroft v. Viper Trans, Inc.)1 involving an automobile collision, remanding the case for another trial—now the third—after the...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

FTC: Be Precise and Accurate With Your Advertising or Beware

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The Federal Trade Commission is taking a hard look at marketing and advertising statements, making sure they are precise and accurate. Here are some key takeaways from recent enforcements:...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

Washington Supreme Court Expands Scope of Anti-Spam Law

Two years ago, we posted about a proposed class action lawsuit that accused Old Navy of spamming consumers with emails that included false or misleading information about the duration of sales. For example, the complaint...more

Robinson+Cole Data Privacy + Security Insider

FTC Settles With accessiBe For Misleading Statements About WCAG Compliance

The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on April 22, 2025, that it has approved a settlement entered into a Final Order with accessiBe, which claimed its plug-in product, accessWidget, “can make any website compliant...more

Mitchell, Williams, Selig, Gates & Woodyard,...

Arkansas Legislative Update: New Technology, Privacy and Cybersecurity Laws

The Regular Session of the 95th General Assembly is set to adjourn sine die on Monday, May 5, 2025. During this session, the Arkansas legislature passed several bills relating to technology, privacy and cybersecurity which...more

Kelley Drye & Warren LLP

NAD Decision Addresses Review Claims

Yesterday, we posted about a decision in which P&G challenged claims that Rascals made about the absorption capabilities of its diapers. Rascals also advertised: ​“210,000+ 5-star reviews of Rascals Products.” P&G thought...more

White & Case LLP

Evolution of AI Washing Enforcement: DOJ Enters the Picture

White & Case LLP on

On April 9, the US Department of Justice and Securities and Exchange Commission announced parallel cases against the founder and former CEO of an artificial intelligence startup for allegedly misleading investors about his...more

DLA Piper

DOJ and SEC Send Warning on “AI Washing” with Charges Against Technology Startup Founder

DLA Piper on

The US Department of Justice (DOJ) announced a criminal indictment and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) announced a civil complaint against the founder and former CEO of an e-commerce technology startup. DOJ and...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

SEC Enforcement Action in SDNY Highlights Risks for AI Companies

On April 9, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York against Alberto Saniger Mantinan, the founder and CEO of Nate, Inc. The SEC...more

Foster Garvey PC

BOGO & Discount Pricing: Are You at Risk of a Class Action?

Foster Garvey PC on

We have noticed a growing trend of class actions suing businesses over pricing practices. Brands and retailers who advertise discounts framing the discount as a bargain off the “regular price” when the business has never...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Denies Motion To Dismiss Putative Securities Class Action Against Cosmetics Company

A&O Shearman on

On March 31, 2025, Judge Arun Subramanian of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied a motion to dismiss a putative securities class action against a cosmetics company (the “Company”),...more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

When is “Misleading” Not “False”? The Supreme Court's Decision in Thompson v. United States and Its Implications for Government...

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

On March 21, 2025, a unanimous Supreme Court held in Thompson v. United States that a federal statute prohibiting “false” statements to banks, 18 USC § 1014, does not apply to statements that are merely misleading. Although...more

Benesch

Fraud by Omission? How Thompson v. United States Could Narrow the Reach of the Federal Wire, Mail, and Bank Fraud Statutes

Benesch on

The vast majority of federal white-collar fraud enforcement actions are prosecuted under the wire, mail, or bank fraud statutes.  18 U.S.C. §§ 1341, 1343, and 1344. The Supreme Court’s recent decision in Thompson v. United...more

870 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 35

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide