News & Analysis as of

Motion to Dismiss › Jurisdiction › Consumer Protection Laws

Morgan Lewis

Litigation Risks Under the DC Consumer Protection Procedures Act: Defense Strategies and Mitigation

Morgan Lewis on

In recent years, public interest organizations have increasingly turned to the District of Columbia’s Consumer Protection Procedures Act (CPPA) to bring legal challenges against companies over their public environmental and...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

District court finds communicating digitally enough to hold defendants liable for doing business in state

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

On May 29, the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina denied a motion to dismiss an action filed against several finance companies accused of violating North Carolina’s consumer protection laws. The...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Python Bites Back: Counterclaims Based on Alleged Consent Survive Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

TCPA defendants often assert, in either a motion to dismiss or answer (or both), that a plaintiff gave prior express consent to receive the calls or text messages at issue. But it is the exceptional case where a defendant...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - May 2018

Smart & Biggar on

An Update on Vanessa’s Law - This is a special update on the Protecting Canadians from Unsafe Drugs Act (Vanessa’s Law) which was approved on November 6, 2014 (as previously reported), amending the Food and Drugs Act...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide