News & Analysis as of

Motion to Dismiss › Supreme Court of the United States › Healthcare Fraud

Paul Hastings LLP

The Verdict Is In: SuperValu Wins at Trial Despite Knowingly Submitting False Claims

Paul Hastings LLP on

In 2023, we wrote about the Supreme Court’s decision in United States ex. rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. interpreting the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter standard to require inquiry into a defendant’s subjective knowledge....more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

The Supreme Court Confirms the Government’s Essentially Unfettered Authority to Dismiss False Claims Act Cases

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

On Friday, June 16, 2023, I (sort of) lost my bet that the Supreme Court would follow the path charted in Borzilleri v. Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, 24 F.4th 32 (1st Cir. 2022) to determine the government’s False Claims...more

BakerHostetler

SCOTUS Majority Affirms the DOJ's Ability to Dismiss Whistleblower Cases Under the False Claims Act - But Dissent Raises Suspicion...

BakerHostetler on

On June 16, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued an 8-1 decision in the case of United States, ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., which held that the Department of Justice (DOJ) can move to dismiss...more

Cozen O'Connor

It’s (Not) About Time - Government May Move to Dismiss FCA Suit at Any Point During its Pendency

Cozen O'Connor on

On Friday, June 16, 2023, the United States Supreme Court (SCOTUS or the Court) upheld prior decisions by the trial court and Third Circuit in U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc. Polansky involves the...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies DOJ’s FCA Dismissal Authority

Wiley Rein LLP on

WHAT: On June 16, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled 8–1 that the Government has broad authority to intervene and dismiss False Claims Act (FCA) suits litigated by relators. U.S. ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources...more

Stevens & Lee

Supreme Court Grants Government Broad Dismissal Rights in Qui Tam Cases

Stevens & Lee on

The U.S. Supreme Court, in an 8-1 decision written by Justice Kagan, held on June 16 that the United States (“Government”), having initially chosen not to intervene in a False Claims Act (“FCA”) qui tam case, but having...more

Epstein Becker & Green

The United States Is the FCA Party in Interest, Not the Relator – SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

It should come as no surprise to constitutionalists, practitioners under the Federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §§3729–3733) (FCA), and auditors of the oral argument in the case that the Supreme Court has held that the...more

Polsinelli

SCOTUS to Determine Key Aspects of Government Dismissal Authority in FCA Cases

Polsinelli on

The United States Supreme Court recently agreed to hear a case interpreting the False Claims Act (“FCA”) that may affect the government’s involvement in pending and future matters. To resolve a circuit split, the Court will...more

The Volkov Law Group

2021 False Claims Act Year in Review: Judicial and Congressional Developments (II of II)

The Volkov Law Group on

As for the Judiciary, the U.S. Supreme Court did not issue any relevant decisions nor grant certiorari in any notable FCA cases in FY21. To the contrary, they denied petitions to review appellate cases of potential...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Lessons From a Year of Escobar

Troutman Pepper Locke on

It has been one year since the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark ruling in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar, which resolved a circuit split as to the validity of the implied false certification theory...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide