News & Analysis as of

Nasdaq California

Allen Matkins

Are Many Nasdaq Global Select Corporations Subject To The California General Corporation Law?

Allen Matkins on

Only a few publicly traded corporations are incorporated in California.  Most either started life in Delaware or later decamped to that state (and more recently other states).  Nonetheless, many of these corporations have...more

Paul Hastings LLP

Public Company Watch: November/December 2024

Paul Hastings LLP on

This edition of the Public Company Watch highlights critical updates and regulatory changes affecting public companies. Staying informed on these topics is crucial for effective compliance and strategic planning. Highlights...more

Allen Matkins

Reverse Stock Splits And The California Corporate Securities Law

Allen Matkins on

Meredith Ervine recently wrote about reverse stock splits and Nasdaq listed issuers.  A reverse stock split is the "go to" solution for many listed issuers whose share prices fall below the minimum continued stock exchange...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Sustainability and ESG Advisory Practice Update, October 2023

We are pleased to share the October 2023 issue of Wilson Sonsini's Sustainability and ESG Advisory Practice Update. Each issue combines news, key legal developments, and resources related to sustainability and environmental,...more

Snell & Wilmer

Board Diversity Initiatives Falter in the Courts but Investor Interest Is Likely to Remain Strong

Snell & Wilmer on

Last year, Superior Courts in Los Angeles County invalidated two California statutes requiring specific diversity mandates for California public company boards (Senate Bill 826 “SB 826” and Assembly Bill 979 “AB 979”). The...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

Assembly Bill 979, California’s Board Diversity Statute, Ruled Unconstitutional

On May 15, 2023, the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 (“AB 979”) violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42 U.S.C. § 1981. As enacted,...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

California’s Board Diversity Statute – Assembly Bill 979 – Ruled Unconstitutional

On May 15, 2023, a district court judge sitting in the Eastern District of California ruled that California Assembly Bill No. 979 violates the Equal Protection Clause of the U.S. Constitution’s Fourteenth Amendment and 42...more

Mintz - Employment Viewpoints

Two Strikes Against Board Diversity: What’s Next for Statutory Governance Initiatives?

On the heels of the April 1, 2022 court decision striking down California’s groundbreaking statute requiring underrepresented community mandates for corporate boards, a different trial court dealt the state’s corporate...more

Mintz - Employment Viewpoints

California Court Strikes Down Board Diversity Law: Now What?

Jen Rubin, chair of Mintz’s ESG practice group, looks at the recent California court decision striking down the state’s law mandating corporate board seats for underrepresented communities. She says boards still need to...more

Mintz - Securities & Capital Markets...

California Board Diversity Statute Unconstitutional

On April 1, 2022, the Los Angeles County Superior Court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff in Crest v. Padilla, a case challenging the constitutionality of Section 301.4 of the California Corporations Code, a...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide