News & Analysis as of

Negligence › Mesothelioma › Toxic Exposure

Goldberg Segalla

$18 Million Verdict Awarded in Asbestosis Case Following Trial against Manufacturer

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Broward County Circuit Court - A Florida jury on April 23 handed down an $18 million verdict in aperitoneal mesothelioma case brought by the law firm of Maune Raichle Hartley French & Mudd, LLC....more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Connecticut Court Awards Punitive Damages in Recent Asbestos Trial

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Estate of Nicholas Barone trial in Bridgeport Superior Court in Connecticut before Judge William Clark concluded with a $15 million plaintiff’s verdict on 5/16/2024. The jury also awarded punitive damages, the exact...more

Goldberg Segalla

Asbestos Distributor Defendant Obtains Summary Judgment Due to Lack of Identification

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, Jan. 13 Plaintiff Glen King  alleged that his exposure to asbestos during the course of his employment with the United States Navy, Louisiana State...more

Goldberg Segalla

Plaintiff unable to provide any legitimate evidence against motions for summary judgment

Goldberg Segalla on

United States District Court of the District of Nevada, September 19, 2022 - The plaintiff commenced this action in early 2020 by filing his Complaint against 13 defendants.  He suffers from mesothelioma and alleged...more

Goldberg Segalla

Summary Judgment Granted as Premises Owner Did Not Owe a Duty to Independent Contractor’s Employee

Goldberg Segalla on

U.S. District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania, February 15, 2022 - In this asbestos action, Carl Gay alleged that he developed mesothelioma after a forty-year career. From 1974 until 1976, Gay worked as a...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Supreme Court Of Virginia Recognizes Employer Liability For “Take Home” Exposure

Husch Blackwell LLP on

Recently, a divided Supreme Court of Virginia, in a 4-3 decision, recognized an employer’s liability for “take home” exposure. In Quisenberry v. Huntington Ingalls Inc., 818 S.E.2d 805 (Va. 2018), the Supreme Court held that...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Fifth Circuit Sets Bright Line Rule For Timing Requirement Under Federal Officer Removal Statute

Husch Blackwell LLP on

In January 2018, a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated a district court’s remand of an asbestos case to state court for being untimely, based on a federal officer removal statute, 28...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

The King’s Time Is Up: Arizona Supreme Court Holds That the Statute of Repose Bars Untimely Claims by State Entities and Overrides...

Troutman Pepper Locke on

City of Phoenix v. Glenayre Elecs., Inc., 2017 Ariz. LEXIS 121 (Ariz. May 10, 2017) - Between 1960 and 2000, Carlos Tarazon (“Tarazon”) performed work installing and repairing water piping for various contractors and...more

Perkins Coie

California Supreme Court Establishes Duty in Take-Home Asbestos Exposure Cases

Perkins Coie on

On December 1, 2016, the Supreme Court of California held that the duty of employers and premises owners to exercise ordinary care in their use of asbestos in their businesses includes a duty to take reasonable care to...more

Polsinelli

"Take-Home" Asbestos Case Decision Could have Ripple Effect

Polsinelli on

Companies facing "take-home" asbestos or other toxic tort exposure claims in Arizona, or in other jurisdictions applying Arizona law, now have a new case to cite in dispositive motions. With the Sept. 20 Arizona Court of...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide