News & Analysis as of

NJ Supreme Court

King & Spalding

NJ Supreme Court Held that Charity Care is Not Unconstitutional Taking

King & Spalding on

On July 16, 2025, the New Jersey Supreme Court unanimously ruled that the state’s charity care requirement—which mandates that hospitals must treat patients regardless of their ability to pay—does not amount to...more

Genova Burns LLC

NJ Supreme Court Tightens Proof Requirements of Arbitration Agreement

Genova Burns LLC on

In its recent decision in Gerald Fazio Jr. v. Altice USA, the New Jersey Supreme Court continued its trend of enforcing strict contract formation requirements in consumer contract cases, serving as a counterbalance to the...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

NJ Supreme Court Ruling Provides Public Agencies With Broad Discretion in Bidding Process

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The New Jersey Supreme Court recently issued an important opinion providing clear guidance for companies seeking to do business with the state of New Jersey, that in public works projects, bid documents must be in full...more

Marshall Dennehey

New Jersey Supreme Court Rules Out-of-State Alleged Tortfeasor Cannot Be Allocated Fault Under Comparative Negligence Act

Marshall Dennehey on

Estate of Crystal Walcott Spill v. Jacob E. Markovitz, M.D., 2025 WL 758318 - In this appeal before the New Jersey Supreme Court, the court held that an out-of-state alleged tortfeasor was not a party subject to allocation of...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

NJ Supreme Court Holds Municipalities Can Be Sanctioned for Frivolous Litigation

Fox Rothschild LLP on

Municipalities are not immune from sanctions under the state’s Frivolous Litigation Statute, the New Jersey Supreme Court has ruled in an appeal that stemmed from affordable housing litigation. In a unanimous decision, the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

New Jersey Supreme Court Confirms: Commissions Are Wages Under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law

Epstein Becker & Green on

In a decision with significant implications for employers and employees alike, the New Jersey Supreme Court on March 17, 2025, clarified that commissions constitute wages under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law (“NJWPL”)....more

Saiber LLC

New Jersey Supreme Court Affirms DEP’s Discretion to Rescind Remediation In Progress Waivers, Underscoring Environmental...

Saiber LLC on

In a unanimous decision issued on April 7, 2025 in In re Appeal of the N.J. Dep’t of Environmental Protection’s Denial of Request for Adjudicatory Hearing, the New Jersey Supreme Court held that the Department of...more

Stevens & Lee

The Need for More Uniformity and Standardization in New Jersey’s Bid Protest Procedures

Stevens & Lee on

Nearly 60 years ago, the New Jersey Supreme Court published one of its seminal bidding cases in Commercial Cleaning Corp. v. Sullivan, holding that a trial-type hearing is not required when challenging a bid award....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

New Jersey Supreme Court Finds Commissions Are Considered “Wages” Under State Law

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On March 17, 2025, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that commissions are considered “wages” under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law (“NJWPL”). This critical decision clarifies that commissions are direct monetary compensation...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Commissions Are ‘Wages’ Under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law, New Jersey Supreme Court Rules

On March 17, 2025, the Supreme Court of New Jersey held that “commissions” must be considered “wages” under the New Jersey Wage Payment Law (WPL) and cannot be excluded as “supplementary incentives” because they are tied to...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

New Jersey Supreme Court Declares Commissions Are Wages Under Wage Payment Law

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In a ruling that should command the attention of all employers in New Jersey who employ and pay commission-based salespersons, the New Jersey Supreme Court has held that commissions are wages under the New Jersey Wage Payment...more

Greenbaum, Rowe, Smith & Davis LLP

New Jersey Supreme Court Opinion Refines Affidavit of Merit Requirements for Malpractice Case Against Physician Certified in...

In another in the seemingly endless series of decisions parsing the interpretation of the statutory requirements for an affidavit of merit in medical liability claims, on January 22, 2025 the New Jersey Supreme Court issued...more

Marshall Dennehey

Key New Jersey Appellate Win Secured in Legal Malpractice Action

Marshall Dennehey on

A decision impacting the defense of such actions from damages claims by new businesses - In an Appellate decision impacting the defense of legal malpractice actions arising out of claims for damages by new businesses, Jack...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

More on the Intersection of Family Law, Estate Law and Federal Law

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In November of 2023, I did a post on this blog titled The Intersection of Family Law, Estate Law and Federal Law, regarding the reported Appellate Division case In the Matter of Michael D. Jones, Deceased. That case dealt...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

New Jersey Appellate Division Reaffirms Broad Scope of CEPA

Fox Rothschild LLP on

The New Jersey Appellate Division recently issued a published decision that reaffirms the analytical framework used for claims brought under New Jersey’s whistleblower statute, the Conscientious Employee Protection Act...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

New Jersey Supreme Court Enforces Stand-Alone Class Action Waiver

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Earlier this year, the New Jersey Supreme Court held in Pace v. Hamilton Cove that class action waivers in consumer contracts that do not contain an arbitration clause (i.e., a stand-alone class action waiver) are not per se...more

Kilpatrick

New Jersey Supreme Court affirms class action waiver untethered to an arbitration agreement

Kilpatrick on

Takeaway: Following the U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. Concepcion, 563 U.S. 333 (2011), numerous courts have upheld class action waiver clauses in mandatory arbitration agreements. But...more

Goldberg Segalla

N.J. Supreme Court Rules No Coverage Available due to Intentional Wrong Exclusion in Policy

Goldberg Segalla on

On December 12, the New Jersey Supreme Court ruled that there was no coverage available to an employer for its employee’s workplace personal injury lawsuit under the employer’s workers’ compensation and employer’s liability...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

NJ Court Rules Clickwrap Arbitration Clause Enforceable

Husch Blackwell LLP on

On March 31, 2022, a lawyer and her husband sustained personal injuries after their rideshare driver ran a red light and collided with another vehicle. The lawyer underwent numerous surgeries and other procedures after...more

Marshall Dennehey

Supreme Court of New Jersey Holds that a Low-Speed Electric Scooter Does Not Qualify Its User as a “Pedestrian” for the Purposes...

Marshall Dennehey on

Goyco v. Progressive Insurance Company, No. 20-cv-1176 (CPO) (SAK) (D. N.J. Mar. 15, 2024) - Commercial trucking and transportation companies are often required to pay for medical and lost wage benefits pursuant to state...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

New Jersey Supreme Court to Hear Important Wage Case

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In June 2024 I wrote this article discussing in-depth the case of Musker v. Succhi, et al., and the implications the Appellate Division’s ruling had for wage disputes regarding sales commissions. As a reminder, the plaintiff...more

Marshall Dennehey

Is the Operator of a Low-Speed Electric Scooter a “Pedestrian” Under N.J.S.A. 39:6a-2(H) and Entitled to PIP Benefits?

Marshall Dennehey on

By way of background, on November 22, 2021, David Goyco was operating a Segway low-speed electric scooter (LSES), which has a maximum speed of 15.5 miles per hour, when he was struck by an automobile. As a result of the...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Court Rejects Application of Flood Exclusion to Hurricane Rainfall

As the Atlantic hurricane season reaches its peak in September, bringing with it rainfall and flooding, a recent New Jersey court held a sewer overflow resulting from rainfall was not caused, directly or indirectly, by a...more

Marshall Dennehey

Supreme Court of New Jersey Holds that Indemnification Can Exist in First-Party Claims, With the Appropriate Language

Marshall Dennehey on

For many years, the rule of law governing claims for contractual indemnification in New Jersey has been well-established under the so-called “Azurak” rule, which requires that, in order for a party to be indemnified for its...more

Mandelbaum Barrett PC

New Jersey Supreme Court Invalidates Non-Disparagement Provision Against Alleged Victim of Discrimination and Harassment

Mandelbaum Barrett PC on

In Savage v. Township of Neptune, et al., (A-2-23, decided May 7, 2024), the New Jersey Supreme Court analyzed and invalidated a non-disparagement provision included in a settlement agreement against a plaintiff alleging...more

298 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 12

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide