News & Analysis as of

Out of Network Provider Health Insurance Health Care Providers

Troutman Pepper Locke

Litigation Heats Up Over Air Ambulance Billing Practices Under the No Surprises Act

Troutman Pepper Locke on

There has been a flurry of recent activity in a case originally filed by six air ambulance companies claiming $20 million in unpaid emergency services invoices. ...more

J.S. Held

All Is Not What It Seems, Or When Is A Dollar A Dime?

J.S. Held on

Welcome to the strange and mysterious world of medical billing. If ever there was an industry in which the charges and the payments have no correlation, the medical industry is it. Medical billing can indeed be quite...more

ArentFox Schiff

Navigating Out-of-Network Claims: Key Takeaways for Providers From Surgery Center Case in New York Federal Court

ArentFox Schiff on

The US District Court for the Eastern District of New York in Manalapan Surgery Ctr., et al. v. 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund, No. 23-CV-03525 (EDNY March 12, 2025), recently granted a motion to dismiss a complaint filed by...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

"No Surprises Act" Ruling Favors Regulators, Insurers

Federal regulators recently won a large legal victory when the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld several provisions of the rule regulating Qualified Payment Amount (“QPA”) calculations under the No Surprises Act (the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Surprise, Surprise! No Surprise Billing Regulations Upheld

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals recently upheld regulations defining the qualifying payment amount (QPA). The QPA is a key factor in determining how much individuals and health plans must pay out-of-network providers in...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

Impact of Strengthened Mental Health Parity Laws: What Employers and Health Care Providers Need to Know

Amundsen Davis LLC on

Insurance coverage requirements for mental health and substance use disorders (“MH/SUDs”) is changing in a way that impacts group health plans, employers, and behavioral health providers. These changes are due to final rules...more

Epstein Becker & Green

A Win for Out-of-Network Providers

Epstein Becker & Green on

In a major win for healthcare providers, on September 20th a Louisiana state court jury awarded $421 million in favor of an out-of-network provider in its long dispute with Blue Cross Blue Shield of Louisiana (“BCBS of...more

Goodwin

Reliance on Third-Party “Pricing” Facilitators Under Increasing Antitrust Scrutiny

Goodwin on

In the past year, healthcare systems and providers across the country have filed a series of antitrust lawsuits against MultiPlan Inc. and major US health insurers, alleging a hub-and-spoke conspiracy to fix and reduce...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Fifth Circuit Affirms Invalidity of No Surprises Regulations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

The Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals has affirmed the invalidity of regulations governing the independent review process under the No Surprise Billing Rules....more

Hall Benefits Law

9th Circuit Explains ERISA Preemption of State Law Claims Arising from Preservice Coverage Communications

Hall Benefits Law on

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit recently issued an opinion with critical implications for the healthcare industry. This court decision clarifies the expansive reach of the Employee Retirement Income Security...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

Court Rejects IDR Rules in No Surprises Act Case

Out-of-network health providers recently won a huge legal victory when the Fifth Circuit Court ruled that federal guidelines regarding Independent Dispute Resolution (“IDR”) proceedings were unlawfully slanted in favor of...more

Napoli Shkolnik

Pricing Algorithms Help Insurers and Harm Patients

Napoli Shkolnik on

The healthcare industry grapples with a pervasive issue of providers overcharging insurers for medical procedures performed on their patients. To combat this, insurers have turned to MultiPlan—a data analytics firm that...more

Arnall Golden Gregory LLP

California Federal District Court Rules That AGG Clients’ Case Against Cigna for Institutional Practice of Under-Reimbursing...

U.S. District Court Judge David O. Carter ruled in favor of AGG’s clients on March 18, 2024, in a case involving “matters of widescale public concern” and a strong “public interest in access” to some of Cigna’s most coveted...more

Hall Benefits Law

The No Surprises Act: A Cost Saving Opportunity for Employer Plan Sponsors

Hall Benefits Law on

Benefits costs continue to increase globally, and in the midst of high inflation and potentially a recession, executives are exploring cost effective methods to manage their self-insured health plans without compromising the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

No Surprises, But Much Uncertainty: The Status of CAA Billing Rules

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Summary - The rules in the Consolidated Appropriations Act that aim to eliminate much of the surprise from billings by out-of-network providers in particular situations are the subject of continued controversy....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

The No Surprises Act: The Departments Proposed Another Increase to IDR Fee, Will it Stick?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

On September 26, 2023, the Departments of Health & Human Services (HHS), Labor, and the Treasury (collectively, the Departments) jointly proposed rules (September Rule) updating the administrative fee and Certified...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

THE NO SURPRISES ACT: Hoping for an End to the Surprises

By looking at the events that have transpired since the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, which includes the No Surprises Act (the Act), was signed into law, it is clear that the Departments of Health and Human Services,...more

Cornerstone Research

5 Questions with Erin Trish: Surprise Billing in Healthcare

Cornerstone Research on

5 Questions is a periodic feature produced by Cornerstone Research, which asks our professionals, senior advisors, or affiliated experts to answer five questions. We interview Professor Erin Trish, of the Schaeffer Center...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Texas Federal Court Issues Fourth Ruling Invalidating Parts of the Administration’s No Surprises Act Regulations

Epstein Becker & Green on

On August 24, 2023, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Texas issued an opinion and order in Texas Medical Association, et al. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services(“HHS”)(“TMA III”). TMA...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

Surprise… No Surprises Act Arbitration Is Too Expensive

Providers finally obtained court ordered relief to the $350 administrative fee each party was required to pay as part of the Federal Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) Process under the No Surprises Act. Until the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Independent Dispute Resolution Process Halted Following the Government’s Third Major No Surprises Act-Related Loss in Federal...

Epstein Becker & Green on

On August 3, 2023, the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (“HHS”), the Department of Labor, and the Department of Treasury (collectively, the “Departments”) temporarily suspended the federal Independent Dispute...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

No Surprises Here: Providers Score Third Victory in No Surprises Act Litigation, Other Challenges to the NSA Continue

Congress enacted the No Surprises Act (NSA) in 2020 to reduce surprise medical bills and to provide a simple and fast procedure for out-of-network health care providers to obtain payment from insurers. The U.S. Department of...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

California Court of Appeal Affirms Grant of Summary Judgment Against Health Care Provider in Win for Managed Care Payors and...

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The California Court of Appeal, in a major win for managed care payors and claims administrators, affirmed a lower court decision granting summary judgment in favor of United Healthcare (United), finding that United did not...more

Snell & Wilmer

CMS' Transparency-in-Coverage Rule: One Year Later

Snell & Wilmer on

In October 2020, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (“CMS”) finalized the Transparency in Coverage Rule (“the Rule”), requiring most health insurance plans and issuers offering individual or group coverage to...more

McDermott Will & Emery

Agencies Issue FAQs on Surprise Billing and Cost-Sharing Rules Coordination

McDermott Will & Emery on

A recent article by the Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) and National Public Radio (NPR) raised the prospect that patients may still see surprise medical bills despite the enactment of the No Surprises Act (NSA)....more

159 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 7

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide