News & Analysis as of

Patent-in-Suit Patent Infringement Personal Jurisdiction

Robins Kaplan LLP

Janssen Prods., L.P. v. EVER Valinject GmbH

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Yondelis® (trabectedin) - Case Name: Janssen Prods., L.P. v. EVER Valinject GmbH, Civ. No. 24-7319, 2025 WL 639380 (N.D. Ill. Feb. 27, 2025) (Harjani, J.)  Drug Product and Patent(s)-in-Suit:  Yondelis® (trabectedin); U.S....more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Apple Inc. v. Zipit Wireless, Inc. (Fed. Cir. 2022)

Personal jurisdiction is one of those basic concepts in civil procedure that evokes strong memories in most lawyers, of their first year in law school, cases like International Shoe, Burger King, Helicopteros, and World-Wide...more

Knobbe Martens

Notice Letters and Communications May Form a Basis for Personal Jurisdiction

Knobbe Martens on

APPLE INC. v. ZIPIT WIRELESS, INC. [OPINION]- PRECEDENTIAL - Before Hughes, Mayer and Stoll.  Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: Notice letters and related...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Xilinx, Inc. v. Papst Licensing GmbH & Co. KG (Fed. Cir. 2017)

Personal Jurisdiction Exists Due to Warning Letters and Prior Litigations in Forum - Establishing personal jurisdiction in the United States over a company operating in a foreign country can be difficult. How does a...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Hospira, Inc.

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Case Name: Helsinn Healthcare S.A. v. Hospira, Inc., Civil No. 15-2077 (MLC), 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45826 (D.N.J. Apr. 5, 2016) (Cooper, J.) - Drug Product and Patents-in-Suit: Aloxi® (palonosetron); U.S. Patents Nos....more

Knobbe Martens

Federal Circuit Review | May 2016

Knobbe Martens on

Federal Circuit Construes Claim Term in a Manner that Rendered Claim Language Superfluous - In SimpleAir, Inc. v. Sony Ericsson Mobile Commc’ns AB, Appeal No. 2015-1251, the Federal Circuit vacated the district court’s...more

Morris James LLP

Defendants’ Potential Liability Is Not Limited To 2% Of Accused Products Shipped To Delaware

Morris James LLP on

Plaintiff asserts jurisdiction under the stream-of-commerce theory. Defendants shipped approximately 2% of the accused products from their Indiana manufacturing facility to two customer distribution facilities in Delaware. ...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide