News & Analysis as of

Patent Infringement Life Sciences Damages

Jones Day

Japanese Court Shatters Previous Record for Damages Award in a Patent Infringement Case

Jones Day on

On May 27, 2025, the Intellectual Property High Court of Japan awarded plaintiff Toray Industries, Inc. ("Toray") ¥21.76 billion (US$151 million; €133 million) in damages for patent infringement by defendants Sawai...more

Quinn Emanuel

Federal Judge Rules on Patent Damages Issue in Mallinckrodt v. Airgas Case

Quinn Emanuel on

A Delaware federal judge has issued a decision regarding the date that a hypothetical negotiation would have taken place, a decision that impacts the amount of damages that could be recovered in the patent dispute between...more

A&O Shearman

Alleged Inappropriate Conduct In Another Litigation Does Not Support Award Of Enhanced Damages

A&O Shearman on

On May 6, 2021, plaintiffs sued defendants for patent infringement in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware. The parties are biotechnology companies and competitors that offer tools for studying...more

MoFo Life Sciences

Patent Vs. Trade Secret Considerations For Cell And Gene Therapies

MoFo Life Sciences on

Understanding what to patent versus what to keep as a trade secret is an increasingly important and challenging decision facing companies developing biologics products, such as cell and gene therapies, where technologies are...more

American Conference Institute (ACI)

[Event] 21st Annual Life Sciences IP Summit - September 27th - 28th, Munich, Germany

Hosted by C5 Group, the 21st Annual Life Sciences IP Summit returns for another exciting year with curated programming with speakers from the pharma, biotech and medical device industries that will provide practical insights...more

Knobbe Martens

Surgeon wins $20M jury verdict against DePuy Synthes for Infringement of Knee Prosthesis Patents

Knobbe Martens on

Rasmussen Instruments, LLC (“Rasmussen”) won a $20M jury verdict against DePuy Synthes (“Depuy”), a part of Johnson & Johnson Medical Devices Companies. Rasmussen asserted Patent Nos. US 9,492,180 (‘180 patent) and US...more

Smart & Biggar

2021 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

In the fall of 2021, the Rx IP Update team celebrated its 20thyear of monthly updates on Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. Below are highlights from our team’s 2021 updates...more

Smart & Biggar

2020 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

In 2020, Rx IP Update reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. We review top developments below: Table of Contents 1. COVID-19: CIPO, Federal Courts, Health Canada 2. PMPRB:...more

Smart & Biggar

2020 Mid-Year Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law

Smart & Biggar on

In the first half of 2020, Rx IP Update reported on a number of developments in Canadian life sciences IP and regulatory law. We review the following top developments...more

Smart & Biggar

2018 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP

Smart & Biggar on

In 2018 we reported on a number of developments in life sciences IP and regulatory law. Our most-read articles were: #1 a June update on biosimilars (authored by Urszula Wojtyra); #2 a “live” summary chart of Vanessa’s Law...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - 2018 Mid-Year Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP

Smart & Biggar on

In this special mid-year edition, we take a look at the major highlights in Canadian life sciences and intellectual property law that we have reported on over the last six months, starting with one of the most closely-watched...more

Smart & Biggar

Rx IP Update - 2017 Highlights in Canadian Life Sciences IP

Smart & Biggar on

The year 2017 was one of the most significant years for Canadian Life Sciences IP and Regulatory Law in Canada’s history. The year saw major developments in patent linkage, patent term, and substantive patent issues. As we...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Following Biosimilar Trial, Jury Awards Amgen $70 Million for Pfizer’s Pre-Approval Infringement of Now-Expired EPO Patent

In one of the first Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act (BPCIA) litigations to reach trial, a jury on Friday awarded Amgen $70 million in damages for Pfizer’s infringement of one of Amgen’s expired patents...more

Knobbe Martens

Smith & Nephew, Arthrex Settled Suture Anchor Patent Dispute Before Trial

Knobbe Martens on

On February 14, 2017, U.S. District Judge Michael Mosman of the United States District Court, District of Oregon granted a Joint Stipulated Motion for Dismissal with Prejudice submitted by Plaintiffs Smith & Nephew, Inc. and...more

14 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide