News & Analysis as of

Patent Infringement › Semiconductors › Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Intellectual Property Report August 2025

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

Key Takeaway: When facing a patent infringement suit, accused infringers traditionally turned to inter partes review (IPR) as a faster, more cost-effective alternative to district court litigation. However, recent guidance...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Pre-Institution Merger Creates Time Bar Under § 315(b)

McDermott Will & Schulte on

Addressing for the first time whether real-parties-in-interest (RPIs) are evaluated at the time a petition is filed or at the time of institution for purposes of § 315(b), the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit held...more

Knobbe Martens

One-Year Clock for Filing IPR Petition Applies to Litigants and Parties That Become Privies of the Litigant Prior to Institution

Knobbe Martens on

POWER INTEGRATIONS, INC v. SEMICONDUCTOR COMPONENTS - Before Prost, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: An IPR is time-barred under 35 U.S.C. § 315(b) if, at the time of...more

Jones Day

ITC Denies Motion to Stay After Weighing Semiconductor Chips Factors

Jones Day on

In a recent order, the ITC denied a motion to stay after ALJ Bullock found that the balance of the Semiconductor Chips factors weighed against granting the motion. See In re Certain Memory Modules And Components Thereof, Inv....more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide