News & Analysis as of

Pharmaceutical Industry › Bristol-Myers Squibb › Inter Partes Review (IPR) Proceeding

Goodwin

PTAB Discretionarily Denies Two Petitions, Refers a Third to the Board in Amgen v. Bristol-Myers Squibb

Goodwin on

On July 24, 2025, Acting Director of the USPTO, Coke Morgan Stewart, denied institution of inter partes review in IPR2025-00601 and IPR2025-00602, but referred the petition in IPR2025-00603 to the Board in Amgen Inc. v....more

Venable LLP

PTAB Director Discretionarily Denies Opdivo® IPRs Based on Settled Expectations of Patent Owner

Venable LLP on

On July 24, 2025, the PTO Acting Director Coke Morgan Stewart discretionarily denied Amgen’s IPR2025-00601 and IPR2025-00602 challenging Bristol-Myers Squibb’s (“BMS”) U.S. Patent Nos. 9,856,320 (“the ’320 patent”) and...more

Goodwin

Amgen Files Three IPR Petitions Challenging Bristol-Myers Squibb Anti-PD1 and Anti-CTLA-4 Antibody Combination Method of Treatment...

Goodwin on

On February 28, Amgen, Inc. (“Amgen”) filed three petitions for inter partes review, challenging the validity of all claims in three patents assigned to Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (“BMS”). The claims of all three patents are...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Mootness on Appeal from PTAB

McDermott Will & Schulte on

The US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal of an inter partes review (IPR), finding that the challenger lacked appellate standing because it had terminated its attempts to develop the infringing...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Court Dismisses Biosimilar Petitioner's IPR Appeal For Lack of Standing

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., the Federal Circuit dismissed Momenta’s appeal from an adverse IPR decision for lack of standing after Momenta suspended its potentially infringing biosimilar...more

WilmerHale

Federal Circuit Holds Petitioner Lacks Standing to Appeal Inter Partes Review Decision

WilmerHale on

On February 7, 2019, in Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, the Federal Circuit dismissed an appeal brought by a petitioner in an inter partes review (IPR) for lack of standing and mootness because...more

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP

Momenta Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. (Fed. Cir. 2019)

McDonnell Boehnen Hulbert & Berghoff LLP on

The Federal Circuit has on several occasions taken the opportunity to address (and in doing so, flesh out) the requirements for Article III standing to appeal an adverse determination in a post-grant review proceeding...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Sometimes the Patent Office Has the Last and Only Word

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The Federal Circuit just issued a decision that confirms its stance on Article III standing for appeals from inter partes reviews (IPRs), making it tougher for unsuccessful IPR petitioners to obtain judicial review of U.S....more

Goodwin

Biosimilar-Related Appeals Pending before the Federal Circuit

Goodwin on

There are presently seven biosimilar-related appeals pending before the Federal Circuit. Two of those appeals, Amgen v. Sandoz (Case No. 18-1551) and Amgen v. Coherus (Case No. 18-1993), are from district court judgments in...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide