News & Analysis as of

Pharmaceutical Industry › Unfair Competition › Food and Drug Administration (FDA)

McDermott Will & Schulte

No Supremacy Clause Preemption Where State Statute Doesn’t Conflict With Federal

McDermott Will & Schulte on

The US Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit explained that ordinarily, when state law contradicts with federal law, the state law may be preempted by the federal law under the US Constitution’s Supremacy Clause. However,...more

Polsinelli

The FTC’s Challenge to the Listing of Device Patents in the Orange Book: What Challenge?

Polsinelli on

On September 23, 2023, the FTC issued a policy statement advising it would be putting market participants on notice that it intends to scrutinize improper Orange Book listings to determine whether such actions constitute...more

Knobbe Martens

Antitrust Lawsuit Brought Against Drug Manufacturer Based on Its Allegedly Improper Listing of Device Patents in the FDA’s Orange...

Knobbe Martens on

As we recently discussed, the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) sent warning letters to certain drug manufacturers regarding their purportedly improper listing of device patents in the Food and Drug Administration’s (“FDA”)...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

FTC Disputes Patent Listings of 10 Brand Drug Makers as Improperly Listed in FDA’s Orange Book

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

On November 7, 2023, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) sent notice letters1 to 10 brand drug manufacturers of drug-device combination products, including drugs delivered by asthma inhalers, epinephrine autoinjectors, and...more

Fish & Richardson

FTC Challenges More Than 100 Patents as Improperly Listed in Orange Book

Fish & Richardson on

On November 7, the Federal Trade Commission announced that it is challenging more than 100 patents held by 10 branded drug companies as improperly or inaccurately listed in the Food and Drug Administration’s Orange Book. The...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Ninth Circuit Holds that Implied Preemption Bars State Law Claims Based on a Violation of the FDCA

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In Nexus Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Central Admixture Pharmacy Services, Inc., 48 F.4th 1040, 1041 (9th Cir. 2022), the Ninth Circuit recently held that the implied preemption doctrine barred state law claims because they were...more

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints

Federal Circuit Affirms that the ITC Cannot Investigate an FDCA Violation without the FDA’s Say-So

Mintz - Intellectual Property Viewpoints on

In Amarin Pharma, Inc. v. Int’l Trade Comm’n (18-1247), the Federal Circuit affirmed the International Trade Commission’s (“ITC”) finding that Amarin’s false advertising claim under § 43(a) of the Lanham Act was precluded by...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

Federal Circuit Amgen Case Clarifies Important Aspects of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati on

On July 21, 2015, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit issued its holding in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., 2015-1499 (Fed. Cir. 2015). The Federal Circuit's decision is the latest development in the long-running...more

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP

Federal Circuit Issues Its First Decision Interpreting BPCIA

Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP on

The courts must “say what the law is,” even when that law, as Judge Lourie described the BPCIA, is “a riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma.” Today, in Amgen Inc. v. Sandoz Inc., No. 2015-1499 (Fed. Cir. July 23,...more

Knobbe Martens

Alert: Fractured Federal Circuit Provides Guidance on Biosimilars Patent Dance

Knobbe Martens on

Both Sides Come Away with Wins in Amgen v. Sandoz - Yesterday, in Amgen, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc., the Federal Circuit construed multiple provisions of the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 (“BPCIA”). ...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

California Supreme Court Details Antitrust Analysis of "Reverse Payment" Patent Settlements

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

Last week, in In re Cipro Cases I & II, Case No. S198616, the Supreme Court of California adopted the United States Supreme Court's application of the Rule of Reason to the antitrust analysis of so-called "reverse payment"...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide