News & Analysis as of

Physicians › Discovery › Medical Malpractice

Marshall Dennehey

Proposed Expert’s Qualification to Proffer Standard of Care Opinions Must Be Evaluated Under the Entirety of Section 512 of the...

Marshall Dennehey on

Key Points: Standard of Care: Patient assessment and discussion of procedures to be performed to evaluate the patient prior to surgery fall under the purview of the standard of care, not informed consent....more

Marshall Dennehey

Pennsylvania Superior Court Affirms Dismissal of Medical Negligence Claims Due to Insufficient Evidence

Marshall Dennehey on

Vandever v. Stair, 2025 WL 523863 (Pa. Super. Ct. 2025) - The Pennsylvania Superior Court upheld the dismissal of a medical negligence claim against a physician, finding that the plaintiff failed to present sufficient...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Supreme Court of Ohio Decides on a Peer-Review Privilege Issue in Stull v. Summa

Epstein Becker & Green on

On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from discovery the file the...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Supreme Court of Ohio Rules on a Peer-Review Privilege Issue in Stull v. Summa

Epstein Becker & Green on

Background - On December 10, 2024, the Supreme Court of Ohio issued its decision in Stull v. Summa, a medical negligence case in which the defendants argued that Ohio’s statutory peer-review privilege protected from...more

Morris James LLP

How Long Does It Take to Resolve a Medical Malpractice Claim?

Morris James LLP on

Medical malpractice claims are complex legal claims that often involve traumatic personal stories and complicated medical and legal issues. Every claim is different, and one unique fact in a case can have a significant impact...more

Nossaman LLP

California’s New Apology Law and Its Impact on Peer Review Hearings

Nossaman LLP on

Parties in peer review hearings can present a wide range of relevant evidence, regardless of its admissibility in a court of law.  But California has passed a new “apology law” that modifies that standard, erecting a...more

Polsinelli

Different Committee, Different Scope: Delaware Court Holds Credentials Committee Documents May Be Subject to Discovery

Polsinelli on

Deborah Palmer (“Plaintiff”), as the surviving spouse of Vance Palmer (“Mr. Palmer”), brought multiple claims against defendants Christiana Care Health Services, Inc. (“Hospital”) and neurosurgeon Bikash Bose, M.D. (“Dr....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Texas Court of Appeals Reaffirms Key Principles Concerning the Medical Peer Review Privilege

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Introduction - A recent decision by a Texas Court of Appeals reaffirms several important principles regarding the medical peer review privilege: (1) communications arguably covered by the peer review privilege need not be...more

Rumberger | Kirk

Morris v. Muniz: A Sword Against Whom?

Rumberger | Kirk on

Until recently, there had been confusion regarding the application of Florida’s Medical Malpractice Act (the “Act”) as it pertains to (1) the proper appellate standard of review of a presuit expert’s qualifications, and (2)...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Florida Supreme Court Strikes Defendants' Ex Parte Interviews with Treating Physicians

Holland & Knight LLP on

• The Florida Supreme Court has dealt a significant blow to Florida's medical malpractice pre-suit process, ruling that statutes authorizing the conduct of informal, ex parte interviews with a medical malpractice claimant's...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide