News & Analysis as of

Promissory Estoppel Insurance Litigation

ArentFox Schiff

Navigating Out-of-Network Claims: Key Takeaways for Providers From Surgery Center Case in New York Federal Court

ArentFox Schiff on

The US District Court for the Eastern District of New York in Manalapan Surgery Ctr., et al. v. 1199 SEIU National Benefit Fund, No. 23-CV-03525 (EDNY March 12, 2025), recently granted a motion to dismiss a complaint filed by...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Promissory Estoppel Claim Allowed to Proceed Against Insurer Based on Reversal in Coverage Position

Wiley Rein LLP on

The United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, applying Florida law, denied an excess insurer’s motion to dismiss an estoppel claim where the insurer reversed its coverage position on which the insured...more

Carlton Fields

Court Denies Reinsurers’ Attempts to Avoid Suit

Carlton Fields on

The U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia recently denied attempts by reinsurers to avoid a suit by moving to have the claims against them dismissed or, in the alternative, seeking to compel arbitration or stay the...more

Carlton Fields

DC District Court Permits Vantage Commodities To File Amended Complaint And Denies Reinsurer Defendants’ Motion For Interlocutory...

Carlton Fields on

The District Court for the District of Columbia issued an order denying a motion to reconsider its prior order allowing Vantage Commodities to file an amended complaint and denying the reinsurer defendants’ motion for...more

Carlton Fields

D.C. Federal Court Permits Insured to Amend Complaint in Reinsurance Dispute Related to Credit Insurance Policy

Carlton Fields on

A District of Columbia federal court partially granted and partially denied a reinsured’s motion to amend its complaint in a dispute over a reinsurance agreement for a credit insurance policy....more

Carlton Fields

New York Trial Court Finds Lexington Has No Duty to Provide Coverage for Damages Stemming from an Insured’s Knowing and...

Carlton Fields on

County of Suffolk v. Lexington Ins. Co., Case Number 604661-2017, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Suffolk County - Under New York law, the requirement of a fortuitous loss is a necessary element for coverage to...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide