News & Analysis as of

Property Owners › Takings Clause › Corporate Counsel

MG+M The Law Firm

Schaap v. United States: PFAS Litigation Continues to Evolve with Novel Takings Clause Claim

MG+M The Law Firm on

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) litigation is rapidly becoming one of the most dynamic and evolving areas of environmental law. With thousands of cases consolidated in the Aqueous Film-Forming Foams (AFFF)...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

SCOTUS Establishes a New Three-Part Test To Determine the “Whole Parcel” in Regulatory Takings Cases

Troutman Pepper Locke on

Property owners who allege a regulatory taking will now need to analyze their holdings against a new, fact-specific, three-factor standard announced by the U.S. Supreme Court to determine what constitutes the owners’ “whole...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Maryland Court of Appeals Opens Door to New Class of Inverse Condemnation Claims

Ballard Spahr LLP on

A property owner states a valid claim for inverse condemnation where the owner alleges that its property was taken by the government's failure to act in the face of an affirmative duty to act, the Maryland Court of Appeals...more

Stinson LLP

U.S. Supreme Court to Decide "Critical Question" in Eminent Domain

Stinson LLP on

This summer, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a critical question that will determine whether some landowners will receive compensation for regulations that restrict the uses of their land. The case, Murr v. Wisconsin, may...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide