News & Analysis as of

Real Estate Development Impact Fees Housing Developers

Winstead PC

2025 Texas Legislative Update: Impact on Developers

Winstead PC on

The 2025 Texas Legislative Regular Session has wrapped up, introducing new laws that will directly affect real estate investors and developers starting September 1, 2025. Winstead continued its long-standing commitment to...more

Allen Matkins

2025 Land Use, Environmental & Natural Resources Update

Allen Matkins on

California stands at a pivotal juncture in 2025, confronting an array of environmental and housing challenges. As usual, the California State Legislature is considering numerous strategies to address these issues. This year’s...more

Allen Matkins

SB 937: Deferral of Residential Development Impact Fees

Allen Matkins on

Senate Bill (SB) 937 (Wiener) went into effect on January 1, 2025. SB 937 eases the financial burden on residential developers by prohibiting local agencies from imposing fees on specified residential development projects...more

Lowndes

Osceola County, St. Cloud, and Mt. Dora Propose Massive Increases to Impact Fees

Lowndes on

Osceola County, City of St. Cloud, and City of Mt. Dora are all set to vote on proposed increases to impact fees that, if approved, will substantially increase the cost of development in these jurisdictions. Below is...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Sheetz v. El Dorado County

On April 12, 2024, the United States Supreme Court decided Sheetz v. El Dorado County, No. 22-1074, holding that the Takings Clause “does not distinguish between legislative and administrative permit conditions,” but instead...more

Saiber LLC

SCOTUS Agrees to Hear Case Concerning the Scope of Constitutional Challenges to Land Use Permit Conditions

Saiber LLC on

The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear Sheetz v. County of El Dorado, California, a case that concerns whether land use permit conditions in the form of monetary exactions created by legislation are...more

Perkins Coie

School Mitigation Fees May Validly be Imposed on Adult-Only Seasonal Farmworker Housing

Perkins Coie on

When imposing a school impact fee on residential development, a district need not separately analyze particular subtypes of projects; the authorizing statutes simply require a reasonable relationship between the need for the...more

Perkins Coie

29th Annual Land Use & Development Law Briefing - 2019

Perkins Coie on

Land Use and Development Case Summaries (short form) - 1. PLANNING AND ZONING - CENTER FOR COMMUNITY ACTION AND ENVIRONMENTAL JUSTICE V. CITY OF MORENO VALLEY, 26 Cal. App. 5th 689 (2018) - Based on the language and...more

Perkins Coie

School District’s Fee Study Did Not Contain the Information Necessary to Lawfully Impose Development Fees

Perkins Coie on

The Sixth District Court of Appeal invalidated a school district’s Level 1 development fee because the underlying fee study did not properly calculate anticipated growth and included the cost of hypothetical new schools that...more

9 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide