News & Analysis as of

Real Estate Development Standing

King & Spalding

Southern District of New York Allows Fraudulent Transfer Claims Accusing JPMorgan and Others of Scheme, Dismisses Claims for...

King & Spalding on

On March 27, 2025, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York largely denied a motion to dismiss fraudulent transfer and tortious interference claims arising out of a dispute over the financing and...more

Bowditch & Dewey

Abutter’s Diminution in Property Value Argument Found Insufficient to Confer Standing to Challenge Special Permit for Research and...

Bowditch & Dewey on

In Pobeda RT II, LLC v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Watertown, 104 Mass. App. Ct. 250 (2024), the Court of Appeals confirmed the longstanding holding that “diminution in property value is an insufficient basis for standing...more

Goulston & Storrs PC

Difficult Multi-Step Process for Obtaining and Cashing In On Appeal Bonds

Goulston & Storrs PC on

Porter v. Bd. of Appeal of Bos., No. 22-P-974, 2024 WL 187241 (Mass. App. Ct. Jan. 18, 2024). The case of Porter v. Bd. of Appeal of Boston is the latest case that involves an eternal question posed by developers: how does...more

Goulston & Storrs PC

Law of the Land - Real Estate Litigation Newsletter - October 2023, Volume II, Issue IV

Goulston & Storrs PC on

EVALUATING EFFECTIVE NOTICE IN EXERCISE OF OPTIONS - Sourcing Unlimited, Inc. v. Cummings Properties, LLC, 102 Mass. App. Ct. 653 (2023) - In Sourcing Unlimited, Inc., plaintiff-tenant Sourcing Unlimited, d/b/a...more

Williams Mullen

The Virginia Supreme Court has made it easier for neighbors to challenge land use approvals - here’s why it matters.

Williams Mullen on

The concept of legal standing made headlines in high-profile U.S. Supreme Court cases this summer; but it is just as critical for cases in Virginia state courts. In the land use and real estate development context, the...more

Goulston & Storrs PC

Law of the Land - Real Estate Litigation Newsletter - March 2022, Volume I, Issue XII

Goulston & Storrs PC on

CASES OF NOTE - SIMILAR PROJECTS, DIFFERENT DECISIONS - Brossi, et al. v. Town of Grafton Planning Board, et al., No. 19 MISC 000551 (MDV), 2021 WL 5833935 (Mass. Land Ct. Dec. 9, 2021) - The Massachusetts Land...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

No Standing to Protect the Pine Barrens

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Before adjudication, a court must determine whether a plaintiff has standing. Standing means that the party has a right to access the courts for a particular dispute. A petitioner bears the burden to show an actual injury and...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

In Rare Move, SJC Enters Immediate Order Reversing Decision That Broadened Density-Based Standing in Zoning Appeals

Pierce Atwood LLP on

In what passes for high drama in the world of Massachusetts land use law, the Supreme Judicial Court (SJC), after hearing oral argument last Thursday in an important case involving standing in zoning appeals, entered an order...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Second Department Affirms Dismissal of Article 78 Proceeding for Lack of Standing

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

The City of New Rochelle adopted an ordinance in 2017, amending the zoning code to apply a senior citizen overlay district to certain real property comprised of approximately 3.4 acres at 121 Mill Road in New Rochelle.  The...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

SEQRA Challenge Rejected by Appellate Court Because of Lack of Standing and Untimeliness of the Challenge

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Several prior blog posts discussed standing requirements under the State Environmental Quality Review Act (SEQRA) and the timeliness of challenging a SEQRA determination. A decision from the Appellate Division, Third...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Mass. Appeals Court Upholds Somerville’s Union Square Revitalization Plan

Pierce Atwood LLP on

In 2012, the City of Somerville, the Somerville Redevelopment Authority (SRA), and the Massachusetts Department of Housing and Community Development approved the Union Square Revitalization Plan (the Plan), an urban renewal...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Fourth Department: Interest in Architecture and Historic Preservation Not Sufficient to Confer Standing Under SEQRA

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In Schmidt v. City of Buffalo Planning Bd., 174 A.D.3d 1413 (4th Dept., July 31, 2019), the petitioner, Terrence Robinson, filed suit to prevent the demolition of an architecturally significant apartment complex, claiming...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Mass. Legislature Weighs Changes to Zoning Act; Quick Decision on Plaintiff’s Standing is Proposed

Pierce Atwood LLP on

Two bills pending at the Massachusetts State House would amend the state Zoning Act, known as Chapter 40A, which governs zoning in every Massachusetts city and town except Boston. The Zoning Act is seldom amended, even though...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Applicant’s Failure To Include Information About The Whole Project On The Site Plan Ends Up In Remand To Planning Board

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

A recent decision from the Supreme Court of Warren County, John Carr v. Village of Lake George Village Board, demonstrates how a simple omission on a site plan approval application can upend an approved project, even though...more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

City of Rye Lacks Standing to Challenge a Westchester County Board of Legislators Decision

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

Over the past several years, this blog has presented several posts on the topic of standing. It is a frequent topic because it is often raised as a threshold issue in zoning and land use cases....more

Farrell Fritz, P.C.

Appellate Division Revives Challenge to New York City’s Moratorium on Hotel Conversions

Farrell Fritz, P.C. on

In Real Estate Bd. of New York, Inc. v. City of New York, Petitioner-Plaintiff Real Estate Board of New York, Inc. (“REBNY”) commenced a hybrid article 78 proceeding and plenary action against the City of New York (“City”)...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Mass. Appeals Court Ventures Onto High Wire Of Zoning Standing Doctrine, Answers Vexing Question

Pierce Atwood LLP on

It’s about time! Not since the notable 1961 adverse possession case Kershaw v. Zecchini have real estate litigators had an important decision inspired by circus performers....more

Carlton Fields

Real Property, Financial Services, & Title Insurance Update: Weeks Ending November 3 & 10, 2017

Carlton Fields on

REAL PROPERTY UPDATE FINANCIAL SERVICES UPDATE TITLE INSURANCE UPDATE - Misrepresentation: developer entitled to directed verdict on claims of fraudulent and negligent misrepresentation asserted by condominium association...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc.

On June 5, 2017, the Supreme Court decided Town of Chester v. Laroe Estates, Inc., No. 16-605, holding that a litigant who wishes to seek relief different from that sought by a party with standing in a lawsuit may not...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Debt Dialogue: April 2017 - Minnesota Appeals Court Addresses Accounting for Trustee’s Fees and Expenses

In a short decision, In re that Certain Indenture Date as of April 1, 2010 (MN Ct. App. April 3, 2017), the Court of Appeals of Minnesota recently addressed a challenge to the award of trustee fees and legal expenses brought...more

Carlton Fields

Real Property & Title Insurance Update: Weeks Ending September 23 & 30, 2016

Carlton Fields on

REAL PROPERTY UPDATE - Foreclosure/Hearsay/Business Records: trial court abused its discretion by excluding the mortgage records, which included records from a prior servicer, where plaintiff’s witness demonstrated...more

Cole Schotz

NJ Developer Gets Green Light for Antitrust Suit as Rival Supermarket Owner Seeks to Block Wegmans

Cole Schotz on

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued a precedential opinion last week when it ruled that a New Jersey real estate developer had standing to pursue antitrust claims against the owner of a nearby ShopRite who engaged in...more

Miller Starr Regalia

First District Applies CEQA Exhaustion/Standing Rules, Upholds Judgment Rejecting Claim of Statutory Exemption for Controversial...

Miller Starr Regalia on

In a published decision filed September 17, 2015, the First District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court’s judgment granting a writ of mandate and finding that a proposed land exchange agreement was not statutorily...more

23 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide