News & Analysis as of

Regulatory Authority National Park Service

Nossaman LLP

Future Uncertain for National Environmental Policy Act Implementation

Nossaman LLP on

Ever since the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit declared in Marin Audubon that the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) had no authority to issue binding National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations,...more

DLA Piper

DC Circuit rules White House CEQ lacks statutory authority to issue binding regulations under NEPA

DLA Piper on

A split panel for the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit (DC Circuit) ruled on November 12, 2024, in Marin Audubon Society, et al. v. Federal Aviation Administration, et al. (Marin Audubon Society)...more

ArentFox Schiff

DC Circuit Questions Validity of Longstanding Council for Environmental Quality Regulations Implementing NEPA

ArentFox Schiff on

In a departure from past jurisprudence, a recent DC Circuit decision questioned whether the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) had the legal authority to issue key regulations under the National Environmental...more

Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP

D.C. Circuit Issues Ruling that Could Affect NEPA Compliance

Clients regulated by, or who have contracts with government agencies regulated by, the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) should be aware of a major, recent court decision. On November 12, 2024, the D.C. Circuit Court...more

Allen Matkins

Unexpected Court Ruling Raises Substantial Questions About National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) Regulations

Allen Matkins on

In a surprise monumental decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit held that the White House Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ) has no authority to issue regulations implementing NEPA and that CEQ’s NEPA...more

Baker Botts L.L.P.

Longstanding NEPA Rules in Doubt After Major D.C. Circuit Ruling

Baker Botts L.L.P. on

On November 12, 2024, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a decision that goes to the heart of how the National Environmental Policy Act is implemented. In Marin Audubon Society v. Federal Aviation...more

Nossaman LLP

D.C. Circuit Invalidates NEPA Regulations

Nossaman LLP on

On November 12, 2024, a divided (2-1) panel of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a ruling invalidating the Council on Environmental Quality’s (CEQ) National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) regulations...more

Beveridge & Diamond PC

The Supreme Court Decides the United States Cannot Have Title to Running Waters

Beveridge & Diamond PC on

The Supreme Court determined in Sturgeon v. Frost that the Nation River, located near Alaska’s eastern border, is not public land for purposes of regulation by the National Park Service (NPS). This case arose due to a...more

Stoel Rives LLP

National Park Service Regulations Do Not Apply to Inholdings in Alaska

Stoel Rives LLP on

Alaska is different—it has moose hunters on hovercrafts, many large national parks, and certain unique federal laws. Last week the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously held that National Park Service laws and regulations of general...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Sturgeon v. Frost

On March 26, 2019, the Supreme Court decided Sturgeon v. Frost, No. 17-949, holding that the federal government does not own a navigable water that traverses a national park in Alaska, so the water is not “public land” under...more

10 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide