News & Analysis as of

Relation Back Doctrine Appeals

MG+M The Law Firm

MA Appeals Court to Weigh New Construction Defect Claims Under Statute of Repose

MG+M The Law Firm on

An appeal being filed with the Massachusetts Appeals Court (Appeals Court) involving construction defects alleged against a condominium developer has the potential to impact construction and design professionals. As a result...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

Amended Complaints, New Defendants and the Relation-Back Doctrine

Freiberger Haber LLP on

“A” brings an action against “B”. The causes of action asserted against “B” are all timely for statute of limitations purposes. Following discovery, “A” learns that “C” played a material role in the facts and...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

Court of Appeals Emphasizes Importance of Identifying the Proper Plaintiff

Fox Rothschild LLP on

It seems obvious that a named plaintiff must be the correct plaintiff in order for it to have standing to move forward with a lawsuit. But figuring out the identity of the correct plaintiff is not always as easy as it should...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Employers May Face an Expanded Liability Period in PAGA Suits Under the Relation Back Doctrine

On February 7, 2022 a California Court of Appeal issued its decision in Hutcheson v. The Superior Court of Alameda County (UBS Financial Services, Inc.). The case addresses the relation back doctrine in the context of a...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

California Court of Appeal Applies ‘Relation Back’ Doctrine to Substitute PAGA Plaintiff’s Claims Deadline

On February 7, 2022, a California appellate court issued the latest decision regarding the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA). Representative PAGA actions, which typically involve a relatively brief statute of limitations,...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

Flip It and Reverse it: Relation Back Requires Notice of Claims Arising Out of Same Conduct, Transaction, Occurrence

McDermott Will & Schulte on

Addressing the application of the relation-back doctrine, the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit revived a lawsuit, finding that damages were available because the amended complaint that asserted new patents related...more

Payne & Fears

No "End Run" Around Brinker Under Section 17200

Payne & Fears on

The California Court of Appeal has affirmed a complete victory by Safeway Inc. over a certified class of wage-and-hour plaintiffs. Esparza v. Safeway Inc., et al., B287927 (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BC369766, June 10,...more

7 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide