News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Appointments Clause

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Fisher Phillips

SCOTUS Allows Enforcement of ACA’s Preventive-Care Mandates But Opens Door for Political Influence: Key Points for Group Health...

Fisher Phillips on

The federal government may continue to enforce the Affordable Care Act’s preventive-care mandates, thanks to the Supreme Court’s recent decision in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management. In a 6-3 bipartisan opinion written by...more

Holland & Knight LLP

Holland & Knight Health Dose: July 8, 2025

Holland & Knight LLP on

With the reconciliation package signed into law, the U.S. House of Representatives is in recess and will return on July 14, 2025. In the interim, the U.S. Senate will focus on the appropriations bills for fiscal year (FY)...more

Hogan Lovells

Supreme Court affirms constitutionality of U.S. Preventive Services Task Force

Hogan Lovells on

On June 27, 2025, the Supreme Court in Kennedy v. Braidwood Management, Inc. upheld the structure of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF, or “Task Force”), overturning a Fifth Circuit decision that had ruled that...more

King & Spalding

Supreme Court Decision Is A Win for Preventative Services Providers

King & Spalding on

Last week, in a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court overturned a Fifth Circuit decision holding that HHS-appointed United States Preventative Task Force (USPTF) members are inferior officers that do not need to be approved by the...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

SCOTUS on ACA Challenge: Seriously Guys, We’re Doing This Again?

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In a closely watched decision, the Supreme Court has upheld the authority of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (Task Force), preserving the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) requirement that health plans cover preventive...more

Epstein Becker & Green

Term Ends with Major Decisions, Including Banning Universal Injunctions - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

If the wide-ranging decisions that ended the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2024 term on Friday have anything in common, it is their length, with some of their syllabi running to five small-print pages and more, and with a plethora of...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 27, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, on the last day of the 2024-2025 term, the Supreme Court of the United States issued five decisions: Trump v. CASA, Inc., No. 24A884: This case addresses whether district courts had the authority to issue...more

Venable LLP

Supreme Court Denies Certiorari to Decide FINRA Authority

Venable LLP on

On June 2, 2025, the Supreme Court denied a petition for writ of certiorari filed by Alpine Securities Corporation challenging a D.C. Circuit ruling granting only limited, preliminary relief to Alpine. Alpine argued that...more

Groom Law Group, Chartered

Supreme Court to Decide Legality of ACA’s Preventive Services Mandate

Groom Law Group, Chartered on

On January 10, 2025, the Supreme Court agreed to hear an appeal in Becerra v. Braidwood Management, Inc. (“Braidwood”). The case (discussed in a prior Groom alert), on appeal from the Fifth Circuit, will determine if the...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

Update: Appellate Showdown Over FCA Qui Tam Provision’s Constitutionality Reaches Eleventh Circuit

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx on

As we anticipated in our October 17, 2024, blog, both the Government and the Relator have appealed the district court’s decision in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, et al. (Zafirov), the first case to...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Federal Government Urges Court of Appeals to Uphold Constitutionality of FCA Qui Tam Provisions

ArentFox Schiff on

Federal Government Urges Court of Appeals to Uphold Constitutionality of FCA Qui Tam Provisions - In a brief filed earlier this week, the US federal government has urged the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold the...more

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP

Appeals We’re Watching: Recent Appeal Potentially Sets Up SCOTUS Ruling on the Constitutionality of Whistleblower-Controlled False...

Partridge Snow & Hahn LLP on

In October of 2024, the United States appealed the federal district court’s judgment in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC.  In that case, the court held that the statute authorizing...more

Perkins Coie

Novel Decision Striking Down False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Statute Tees Up Further Litigation Over Whistleblower Lawsuits

Perkins Coie on

A recent Florida district court decision declared that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) qui tam provision violates the Constitution by vesting executive power in private whistleblowers (relators) that have not been appointed by...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

Federal District Court in Florida Holds FCA’s Qui Tam Provisions Unconstitutional

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

Mandatory disclosure obligations significantly changed for federal grant recipients, sub-recipients, and applicants on October 1, 2024. The amended federal regulation establishing these mandatory disclosures (2 C.F.R. §...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

District Court Finds Qui Tam Provisions of the False Claims Act Unconstitutional

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

This landmark decision, if upheld on appeal, has the potential to drastically reduce the number of False Claims Act actions brought against government contractors. A U.S. District Court in Florida held that the qui tam...more

King & Spalding

United States District Court in Florida Holds False Claims Act Qui Tam Provision Unconstitutional

King & Spalding on

On September 30, 2024, a federal district court in Florida held the qui tam enforcement provision of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), which permits private citizens to pursue actions in the name of and on behalf of the...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

Middle District of Florida Accepts Justice Thomas’s Invitation: FCA Qui Tam Provision Unconstitutional

Latham & Watkins LLP on

The Zafirov decision finds that the False Claims Act qui tam provision violates Article II of the US Constitution. On September 30, 2024, in United States ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates LLC, Judge Kathryn...more

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis

Middle District of Florida Judge Finds False Claims Act’s Qui Tam Provision Unconstitutional

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis on

On September 30, 2024, Judge Kathryn Kimball Mizelle of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida issued an order in United States ex rel. Clarissa Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates, LLC, holding that the...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Florida Federal Court Holds False Claims Act Qui Tam Provision Violates Article II

Ballard Spahr LLP on

A federal court in Florida this week ruled that the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act (FCA) is unconstitutional under the Appointments Clause in Article II of the U.S. Constitution, creating an opportunity for a split...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

District Court Declares FCA Qui Tam Provision Unconstitutional

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &... on

On September 30, 2024, in U.S. ex rel. Zafirov v. Florida Medical Associates LLC, Judge Kathryn Mizelle in the Middle District of Florida dismissed a qui tam action under the False Claims Act (“FCA”) on the basis that the...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government...

The FCA’S Qui Tam Provisions Under Fire

Morrison & Foerster LLP - Government... on

Last year, Justice Clarence Thomas’s dissent in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Executive Health Resources, Inc., 599 U.S. 419 (2023) (“Polansky”), resurrected an old debate about whether the False Claims Act (FCA) qui tam...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Novel Ruling Raises Questions About Timing of Constitutional Challenges to the FCA’s Qui Tam Provisions

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

In recent months, False Claims Act (FCA) defendants have increasingly sought to challenge the constitutionality of the statute’s qui tam provisions. This trend gained momentum following Justice Thomas’s dissent in United...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

Challenge to False Claims Act Qui Tam Provisions Fails in an Initial Attempt to Revive Long-Dormant Arguments as to...

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

This July, we detailed the Supreme Court’s surprising revival in United States ex rel. Polansky v. Exec. Health Resources, No. 21-1052 (S. Ct. June 16, 2023) of the question of whether the qui tam provisions of the False...more

Burr & Forman

Jarkesy Gets His Day: SCOTUS to Review SEC ALJs

Burr & Forman on

On June 20, 2023, the Supreme Court granted certiorari to review three questions about the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC’s) administrative courts...more

Venable LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Justices Thomas and Gorsuch Skeptical of ALJ Proceedings in Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission...

Venable LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s landmark decision unanimously reversing the Ninth Circuit in Axon Enterprise v. Federal Trade Commission is likely to represent a monumental shift in pre-enforcement challenges to administrative...more

173 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 7
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide