News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Corporate Taxes

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Tax Bytes: Week of July 14, 2025

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Welcome to this week’s edition of Tax Bytes. Our team of tax lawyers is actively monitoring for federal and international tax developments and issues of note. Each week we pull together the items we deem most important to...more

Cozen O'Connor

Pennsylvania Perspective for Monday, June 30, 2025

Cozen O'Connor on

Legislators to Miss Budget Deadline Again Amid $5.5B Gap, Policy Disputes -For the fourth consecutive year, Pennsylvania lawmakers have missed the June 30 budget deadline as negotiations stall over how to close a projected...more

Kilpatrick

4 Key Takeaways | The Top 10 Sales and Tax and Income Tax Cases

Kilpatrick on

Kilpatrick’s David Hughes recently participated in a panel titled - “The Top 10 Sales Tax and Income Tax Cases” - at the Council on State Taxation (COST) Annual Spring Meeting in New Orleans. David and his fellow thought...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

FedEx Defeats Government’s Loper Bright Gambit

McDermott Will & Schulte on

On February 13, 2025, a Tennessee federal district court handed FedEx Corporation its second win in a refund action involving the application of foreign tax credits to what are known as “offset earnings.”[1] Offset earnings...more

Blank Rome LLP

Supreme Court of Ohio Affirms Denial of Healthcare Service Provider’s Commercial Activity Tax Refund Claim

Blank Rome LLP on

The Supreme Court of Ohio upheld the denial of Total Renal Care, Inc.’s (“TRC”) refund claim of Ohio Commercial Activity Tax (“CAT”) that it paid on services that it performed outside of Ohio. Total Renal Care Inc. v. Harris,...more

Latham & Watkins LLP

The Corporate AMT’s Crypto Problem Poses Constitutional Hazards

Latham & Watkins LLP on

Under recent accounting rule changes, unrealized crypto gains must generally be reported on income statements, but questions arise about the alignment of the new Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax with constitutional tax...more

Allen Barron, Inc.

How Did Moore v. United States Change U.S. Tax Law?

Allen Barron, Inc. on

We have been waiting several months for the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) to render a decision in Moore v. United States. Initially, our questions focused on the issue of “realized or unrealized income” and...more

Freeman Law

Supreme Court Upholds Section 965 Mandatory Repatriation Tax

Freeman Law on

On June 20, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its long-anticipated decision in Moore v. United States, in which a 7-2 majority upheld the constitutionality of the mandatory repatriation tax (“MRT”) under section 965 of the...more

Gray Reed

SCOTUS Upholds MFT: Moore Et Ux v. US

Gray Reed on

On June 20, 2024, the Supreme Court released its opinion in Moore et ux v. US, authored by Kavanaugh, decided by 6-3 vote and marking a rare instance for the Court to interpret the 16th Amendment, upholding the...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 20, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued four decisions today: Moore v. United States, No. 22-800: This case concerns the constitutionality of the Mandatory Repatriation Tax (“MRT”) included in the 2017 Tax Cuts and...more

BakerHostetler

Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Repatriation Tax but Suggests Wealth Taxes a Step Too Far

BakerHostetler on

The U.S. Supreme Court today upheld the constitutionality of the so-called “mandatory repatriation tax” in a narrow ruling, stating that the MRT taxes realized income — income earned by the offshore corporation — and...more

Allen Barron, Inc.

Could an Upcoming Supreme Court Case Significantly Change US Tax Law?

Allen Barron, Inc. on

Could a Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) case significantly change US tax law? We are closely watching the developments in Moore v United States as it carries significant issues regarding “realized” versus...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Five things to know about the Supreme Court’s grant of certiorari in Moore v. United States

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

The Supreme Court granted certiorari on June 26 with respect to the Ninth Circuit’s decision in Moore v. United States. The question presented is whether the section 965 transition tax is a “direct tax” that violates the...more

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck

Taxation & Representation, April 26, 2022

Brownstein Hyatt Farber Schreck on

SCOTUS Denies New York v. Yellen. The U.S. Supreme Court announced on Tax Day it would not hear a constitutional challenge to the $10,000 deduction limit on state and local taxes (SALT) enacted under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Financial Daily Dose 4.6.2021 | Top Story: Treasury Sec. Yellen Proposes Global Minimum Tax Rate for Multinational Businesses

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Back at it. Let’s get caught up . . . Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen is calling for a global minimum tax rate on multinational corporations, a move aimed at helping “prevent companies based in other countries from having a...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Skadden's 2020 Insights

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

Despite political and economic uncertainties, markets and deal activity were resilient in 2019, and strong fundamentals remain in place heading into 2020. Companies continue to face a challenging litigation and enforcement...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Your Daily Dose of Financial News

Robins Kaplan LLP on

Germany’s diesel emissions scandal bears a lot of resemblances to the Wells Fargo debacle here at home. It just can’t seem to quit itself. This week, we’ve learned that German authorities have opened a criminal inquiry into...more

Williams Mullen

Southeast State & Local Tax: Important Developments - March 2016

Williams Mullen on

The Williams Mullen Southeast State and Local Tax (SESALT) team is pleased to provide you with a comprehensive recap of important tax developments around the Southeast....more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Wynne’s First Casualty: First Marblehead Corp. v. Commissioner

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court vacated the decision of the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in First Marblehead Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue (First Marblehead) and remanded the case back to the court for...more

Pierce Atwood LLP

Under the Dome: Inside the Maine State House

Pierce Atwood LLP on

Under the Dome: Inside the Maine State House provides a high-level overview of recent activity at the Maine State House. Legislature Plans Long Day - Early this past Wednesday morning, the Maine House and Senate...more

Cozen O'Connor

U.S. Supreme Court Holds Maryland Personal Income Tax Unconstitutional Under Commerce Clause

Cozen O'Connor on

In Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne, Dkt. No. 13-485 (U.S. May 18, 2015), the U.S. Supreme Court found that Maryland’s system of personal income taxation violated the nondiscrimination prong of the dormant...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Wynne Is a Win for Corporate Taxpayers

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On May 18, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Comptroller of the Treasury of Maryland v. Wynne, No. 13-485, holding that the absence of a credit against the local portion of the state’s personal income tax scheme was an...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On March 4, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc., No. 13-553, holding that a rail carrier can prove discrimination under the Railroad Revitalization and Regulation Reform...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Hears Arguments in 4-R Act Case (For the Second Time)

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

On December 9, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the last of three state and local tax cases that it accepted this term – Alabama Department of Revenue v. CSX Transportation, Inc. (CSX II), a case that had...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides United States v. Clarke

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 19, 2014, the United States Supreme Court held that a taxpayer has the right to examine Internal Revenue Service (IRS) officials regarding their reasons for issuing a summons only if the taxpayer points to facts or...more

26 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide