News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States Drug Pricing Healthcare

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
McDermott Will & Schulte

PBMs Score a Win in Federal Court Against State Regulation

A recent federal court decision has the potential to tip the balance in an ongoing series of skirmishes over state regulation of pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs). In McKee Foods Corp. v. BFP Inc. d/b/a/ Thrifty Med Plus...more

Paul Hastings LLP

SuperValu and Executive Health Resources: What to Know About the FCA Following the 2023 Term

Paul Hastings LLP on

As we take stock of the Supreme Court’s 2023 term, two landmark decisions shift our understanding of scienter and government intervention as it relates to the False Claims Act (“FCA”), 31 U.S.C. § 3729. First, on June 1,...more

Epstein Becker & Green

SuperValu’s Effect on the FCA Scienter Standard and Impact to Future Litigation

Epstein Becker & Green on

n June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously settled a long-standing dispute over a subjective versus objective standard for scienter under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s own subjective belief is...more

Dickinson Wright

False Claims Act “Knowledge” Is a Subjective Standard

Dickinson Wright on

The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) allows private parties to bring lawsuits in the name of the federal government against defendants who allegedly “knowingly” present a false claim to the government for payment. The...more

Burr & Forman

Do I Believe You? Scienter Standard in a FCA Case

Burr & Forman on

Two False Claims Act (“FCA”) cases have recently been decided by the United State Supreme Court, further clarifying one aspect of the FCA. In the recent decisions in U.S. ex rel Proctor v. Safeway, Inc. and U.S. ex rel....more

Polsinelli

SCOTUS Rejects Defense-Friendly Scienter Standard In Schutte Opinion

Polsinelli on

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) issued its much-anticipated opinion in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. and United States ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc. (Schutte), holding...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

SuperValu: Supreme Court Clarifies FCA’s State-of-Mind Requirement

On June 1, 2023, in U.S. ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., the Supreme Court clarified the state-of-mind (or “scienter”) standard under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that a defendant’s subjective belief that a claim...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court’s SuperValu Decision: a Game-Changer for Assessing FCA Violations

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Summary - On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a landmark decision in False Claims Act cases. In United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc., it unanimously held that liability under the False Claims Act depends...more

McDermott Will & Schulte

SuperValu: It’s Not Super Bad! A Practical Look at the Supreme Court’s Recent FCA Scienter Ruling

Two separate lawsuits alleging False Claims Act (FCA) violations by retail drug pharmacies made their way to the Supreme Court of the United States this term. The lawsuits decided whether the pharmacies could defeat these...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies False Claims Act Scienter Element in Schutte

On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated decision in the consolidated cases United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. and United States ex rel. Proctor v. Safeway, Inc., Nos. 21-1326 &...more

Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati

U.S. Supreme Court Closes Door on Objective Reasonableness Defense in Healthcare False Claims Act Cases

Leaves Window Open for Defense Based on Subjective Belief - On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision in a consolidated appeal of two healthcare qui tam cases that removes a very powerful defense from...more

Warner Norcross + Judd

Supreme Court Removes Some Defenses to False Claims Act Liability for Government Contractors and Health Care Providers

Government contractors, health care providers and many other parties who submit claims for payment to the federal government are subject to liability under the False Claims Act (FCA). This month, the U.S. Supreme Court issued...more

ArentFox Schiff

Investigations Newsletter: Supreme Court Again Tightens FCA Intent, But Tricky Questions Linger

ArentFox Schiff on

The US Supreme Court brushed aside novel assertions from two pharmacy retailers on June 1 and ruled unanimously that False Claims Act liability hinges on whether defendants subjectively believed their claims were “false.” In...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Supreme Court Rejects an Objective Standard for False Claims Act Inquiries

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The False Claims Act imposes liability for false and fraudulent claims a defendant submitted with the requisite state of mind, or scienter. Before the Supreme Court handed down its June 1, 2023, decision in the combined...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

Supreme Court Rejects “Objectively Reasonable” Defense to False Claims Act Liability

The SuperValu case arose from separate lawsuits against two companies that operate retail drug pharmacies across the country: SuperValu Inc. and Safeway, Inc. In each case, a whistleblower – on behalf of the federal...more

Perkins Coie

US Supreme Court Clarifies Knowledge Requirement in False Claims Act Cases—Raising New Interpretive Issues

Perkins Coie on

A defendant’s knowledge of and subjective beliefs about the meaning of legal requirements—not what an objectively reasonable person may have believed—are what matters when determining whether a defendant “knowingly” submitted...more

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP

Part III | SCOTUS Ruling: “Knowing” Violations of Unknowable Rules: Is the Supreme Court Poised to Alter the FCA Enforcement...

Zuckerman Spaeder LLP on

For background on this case, please refer to Part I. For updates from the Supreme Court oral arguments on April 18, please refer to Part II. On Thursday, June 1, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in United States et al....more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

United States Supreme Court: Look to Defendant’s Subjective Beliefs to Decide Whether It “Knowingly” Submitted False Claim

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a decision in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu, Inc., clarifying when a defendant “knowingly” submits a false claim for payment under the False Claims Act (FCA). The Court...more

Cozen O'Connor

Unanimous Supreme Court Holds (Reaffirms) False Claims Act Responsibility Requires Offender’s Belief of Lie

Cozen O'Connor on

On June 1, 2023, the United States Supreme Court issued its ruling in two consolidated cases concerning the False Claims Act (FCA), United States ex rel. Schutte et al. v. SuperValu Inc. et al., Case No. 21-1326, and United...more

ArentFox Schiff

Supreme Court FCA Scienter Ruling Revives Fraud Lawsuits Against Safeway and SuperValu

ArentFox Schiff on

Supreme Court FCA Scienter Ruling Revives Fraud Lawsuits Against Safeway and SuperValu On Thursday, the US Supreme Court issued its highly anticipated ruling regarding the threshold of liability under the False Claims Act...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Clarifies that Subjective (Not Objective) Knowledge of Falsity of Claim Dictates False Claims Act Liability

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision holding that the scienter element of the False Claims Act (“FCA”) is met if a defendant subjectively knew his or her claims were false and submitted them anyway....more

Robinson+Cole Health Law Diagnosis

Unanimous Supreme Court Endorses Subjective Belief Standard for False Claims Liability

On June 1, 2023, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a unanimous opinion in the highest-profile False Claims Act (FCA) case for many years, concluding that a party’s subjective belief as to whether it overcharged Medicare and...more

Akerman LLP - Health Law Rx

SafeCo No More: The Changing Landscape of Scienter under the False Claims Act

Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court held that a False Claims Act (FCA) defendant cannot rely on an objectively reasonable interpretation of a law, regulation, or rule to negate the scienter element of the FCA. In...more

Wiley Rein LLP

Supreme Court Rules FCA Scienter Element Focuses on Defendants’ Subjective Beliefs Only

Wiley Rein LLP on

WHAT: The U.S. Supreme Court handed down its much-anticipated decision in United States ex rel. Schutte v. SuperValu Inc. The Court considered the narrow issue of whether the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter requirement...more

Polsinelli

SCOTUS Appears Poised To Reject Defense-Friendly Safeco Scienter Standard In FCA Cases

Polsinelli on

On April 18, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) heard oral arguments in a pair of monumental False Claims Act (FCA) cases to decide whether and when a defendant’s subjective understanding of an objectively...more

30 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide