News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Employment Contract › Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA)

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

The Importance of Having an Up-To-Date Employment Arbitration Agreement

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP on

Until the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises v. Moriana in 2022, California law had established that Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) claims could not be subject to binding arbitration....more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Every PAGA Action Has An Individual Component Which May Be Subject To Arbitration

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP on

Prior to the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises Inc. v. Moriana, California courts did not consider the components of a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) claim. ...more

CDF Labor Law LLP

Discretion: The Better Part of Valor in Defending Against PAGA Claims

CDF Labor Law LLP on

Since the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision in Viking River Cruises v. Moriana, employers have been implementing and enforcing arbitration agreements requiring employees to arbitrate their individual Private Attorneys’ General...more

ArentFox Schiff

Ninth Circuit’s Reversal Allows Mandatory Employment Arbitration Agreements in California

ArentFox Schiff on

In another reversal of course, the US Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals cleared the way again for California employers to require arbitration agreements. The latest 2-1 decision in Chamber of Commerce v. Bonta, issued on...more

Baker Donelson

Employers: Do Not Wait to Demand Arbitration

Baker Donelson on

The Supreme Court this term issued rulings in several cases involving arbitration. In Morgan v. Sundance, Plaintiff Robyn Morgan, who worked at a Taco Bell franchise owned by Sundance, filed a class action lawsuit against her...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Holds That PAGA Representative Waivers Are Enforceable In Certain Significant Respects

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On June 15, 2022, the United States Supreme Court issued its much anticipated decision in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana. The Supreme Court held that California’s rule invalidating pre-dispute agreements waiving the...more

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Supreme Court Considers the Reach of Workplace Arbitration Agreements

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on

The Supreme Court has recently taken the challenge of assessing the scope and breadth of workplace arbitration provisions under the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”) in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, and Southwest...more

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP

Supreme Court Hears Oral Argument on Arbitrability of California's Private Attorneys’ General Act Under Federal Arbitration Act

Ervin Cohen & Jessup LLP on

Since the California Supreme Court’s ruling in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC in 2014, it has been widely understood that Private Attorneys’ General Act (“PAGA”) actions cannot be subject to employment...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

As Supreme Court Hears Argument in Viking River Cruises, PAGA’s Most Consequential Case Faces an Uncertain Future

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

Today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. Moriana, Case No. 20-1573. Wage and hour practitioners, particularly in California, have watched the case with keen interest because it...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

Good Tidings for the Holidays! The U.S. Supreme Court Finally Will Review (and May Bury) PAGA’s Anti-Arbitration Rule

Proskauer - California Employment Law on

While the California Supreme Court has repeatedly upheld arbitration agreements with class action waivers (as they must under the Federal Arbitration Act), in a now infamous (and controversial) decision from 2014, the court...more

Lewitt Hackman

FRANCHISEE 101: Class Not in Session

Lewitt Hackman on

In May, the U.S. Supreme Court held that mandatory arbitration agreements containing class action or collective action waivers must be enforced as written....more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

The Case for Class - Class Action Waivers in Arbitration Agreements

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

Last month, in Epic Systems Corp. v. Lewis, the Supreme Court of the United States decided class action waivers in employment arbitration agreements do not violate the National Labor Relations Act (“NLRA”). A class action...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

California Employment Law Notes - July 2015

Proskauer - California Employment Law on

Employee's Inability To Work For A Particular Supervisor Does Not Constitute A "Disability" - Higgins-Williams v. Sutter Med. Found., 237 Cal. App. 4th 78 (2015) - Michaelin Higgins-Williams worked as a clinical...more

McManis Faulkner

The Changing Face of Employment Arbitration Agreements in California

McManis Faulkner on

Arbitration. A simple word, but one that, in the context of employment agreements, was typically a “dirty” word in the eyes of California courts. Indeed, for many years, state courts could be seen as openly hostile to...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

UPDATE: SCOTUS Denies Petition For Cert In Iskanian

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On June 24, 2014, the California Supreme Court issued a controversial decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC. While the Court in Iskanian confirmed that an express class action waiver in an employment...more

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation

High Court Says “Let It Ride”; Limo Company Fails to Flag Down Enough Justices to Hear PAGA Carve-out Case

Orrick - Employment Law and Litigation on

On January 20, the United States Supreme Court denied certiorari in CLS Transportation Los Angeles LLC v. Iskanian, leaving intact a decision by the California Supreme Court holding that representative Private Attorney...more

Weintraub Tobin

U.S. Supreme Court Declines Review of California’s Iskanian Decision – California State and Federal Courts Remain Divided on PAGA...

Weintraub Tobin on

The U.S. Supreme Court has declined to review California high court’s landmark decision in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, which held that arbitration agreements with mandatory class waivers are generally...more

Carlton Fields

California’s Inconsistent Treatment of Pre-Dispute Waivers in Arbitration Agreements Will Remain in Place

Carlton Fields on

This week, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant review in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC, leaving in place a California Supreme Court holding that pre-dispute arbitration agreements cannot require...more

Proskauer - California Employment Law

U.S. Supreme Court Tires (For Now) of Playing “Whack-a-Mole” With California Over Arbitration

Proskauer - California Employment Law on

On January 20, 2015, the U.S. Supreme Court denied the petition for certiorari filed in CLS Transp. Los Angeles, LLC v. Iskanian, a case in which the California Supreme Court held that waivers of employees’ right to bring...more

BakerHostetler

The Supreme Court’s denial of certiorari in Iskanian only hardens the federal-state divide over PAGA claims

BakerHostetler on

The divide continues between California and federal law on whether an arbitration agreement can entirely waive an employee’s ability to seek classwide or multiparty representational relief. The Supreme Court on Tuesday denied...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

PAGA Representative Claims Remain Alive After SCOTUS Denies Iskanian Review

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

Yesterday, the Supreme Court of the United States declined review of a state supreme court case that has sparked widespread flux in the landscape of class action arbitration waivers in California. In Iskanian v. CLS...more

Fenwick & West LLP

Fenwick Employment Brief - July 2014

Fenwick & West LLP on

California Employees Can Waive Class Claims In An Arbitration Agreement, But Not PAGA Claims - Resolving an issue that has created uncertainty for California employers, the California Supreme Court recently held in...more

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP

California Supreme Court: Gentry is Gone. PAGA Lives On.

Pillsbury Winthrop Shaw Pittman LLP on

Compelled by U.S. Supreme Court precedent advancing arbitration as a method of dispute resolution, the California Supreme Court in Iskanian v. CLS Transportation Los Angeles, LLC (No. S20432, June 23, 2014) held that its...more

Mintz - Employment, Labor & Benefits...

California Supreme Court Upholds Employment Class Action Waivers, but Rejects Waivers of PAGA Claims

Mintz - Employment, Labor & Benefits... on

The California Supreme Court issued an important decision last week on the enforceability of employment class action waivers included in arbitration agreements. The result: private parties can contract for the waiver of the...more

24 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide