News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › LGBTQ › Employment Discrimination

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Decision Legalizing Same-Sex Marriage Hits 10-Year Anniversary

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

Ten years have passed since the Supreme Court of the United States granted all same-sex couples the right to marry and have their marriages recognized nationwide. ...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

SCOTUS wraps it up: Four lessons for employers

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

"Reverse discrimination," ADA, religion, and nationwide injunctions. The 2024-25 term of the U.S. Supreme Court is over. Two decisions at the end of the term directly addressed employment law issues, and two others will have...more

Franczek P.C.

Week in Review: 7 Legal Developments you Should Know About

Franczek P.C. on

As the academic year is now wrapping up, we hope that the final weeks of school have been relatively stress free, and that our clients are now looking forward to some slower summer days. Here at Franczek, we have continued to...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

New (Old) Battlegrounds: The Administration’s Targeting of Transgender Rights

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Within the last two months, both the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the armed services have followed Trump Administration directives to narrow or eliminate protections for transgender individuals....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

SCOTUS Argument Recap: Court Appears Likely to Eliminate Heightened Prima Facie Burden for Majority Group Plaintiffs Under Title...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In a recent oral argument, the Justices seemed largely aligned with the plaintiff’s position that majority and historically disadvantaged groups should face the same prima facie test under Title VII....more

McAfee & Taft

SCOTUS to weigh in on reverse discrimination claim brought by heterosexual employee

McAfee & Taft on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, an employment discrimination lawsuit that focused on a reverse discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Expresses Skepticism Over Higher Burden in Majority Discrimination Cases

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments in a case to determine whether employees who are part of a majority group must meet a higher standard to prove discrimination....more

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP

New Administration Outlook: Guidance for Employers Amid the Attack on LGBTQ Workers

Davis Wright Tremaine LLP on

President Trump's orders targeting "woke gender ideology" do not change existing employment protections for LGBTQ employees, though threats to federal funding remain ambiguous. Title VII of the Civil Rights Act and many...more

Offit Kurman

Defending Women from Gender Ideology an Individual’s Sex Is Not a Simple Matter

Offit Kurman on

On January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued the executive order titled “Defending Women from Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth to the Federal Government.” This directive mandates that all federal...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Analyzing President Trump’s “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism And Restoring Biological Truth To The Federal...

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On January 20, 2025, President Trump issued an Executive Order titled, “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism And Restoring Biological Truth To The Federal Government” (the “EO”). The EO declares that “[i]t is the...more

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace

President Trump’s Executive Order on Recognizing Two Sexes: Implications for Private Employers

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace on

On Monday, January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order entitled “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth To The Federal Government” (the “Order”).  The Order...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Michigan Extends Employment Law Protections to Prohibit Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Although many company equal employment opportunity and no-harassment policies prohibit discrimination or harassment based on sexual orientation and gender identity, not all applicable state civil rights laws provide such...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Pride: More than a Single Month, More than a Single Decision

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

As Pride Month draws to a close, employers should focus on how to create a more inclusive workplace throughout the year. From day one of law school, I have revered the Supreme Court Justices and its opinion. I have held...more

Fisher Phillips

The Top 20 Non-COVID Workplace Law Stories Of 2020

Fisher Phillips on

That this past year was the most challenging year in your professional life is an almost certainty. You were forced to learn entirely new statutory schemes, absorb new local health directives on a near-daily basis, create a...more

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP

SCOTUS Wrapup and Preview 2020

Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP on

In this episode, recorded on Sept. 14, Akin Gump Supreme Court and appellate practice co-head Pratik Shah returns to review the 2019 Supreme Court Term and preview the big cases and topics in the October 2020 Term. Among...more

Fisher Phillips

A Simplified View Of The Supreme Court’s 2019-2020 Workplace Law Term

Fisher Phillips on

Supreme Court decisions are often the most challenging pieces of legal guidance to understand. They are rarely straightforward and usually contain so much analysis that it becomes hard to get to the bottom of what was...more

Fisher Phillips

June 2020: The Top 21 Labor And Employment Law Stories

Fisher Phillips on

It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always seems to evolve at a rapid pace, there have been an unprecedented number of changes for the past few years—and this past month...more

Cole Schotz

Supreme Court Holds That Employers Cannot Discriminate Against Employees On The Basis Of Sexual Orientation Or Gender Identity

Cole Schotz on

On June 15, 2020, in a 6-3 decision, the United States Supreme Court made clear that employers may not discriminate against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity. Specifically, the Court held that...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

2019-20 Supreme Court Update

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s 2019-20 term is receiving substantial attention for cases involving signature initiatives of President Donald Trump’s administration. But the Court also maintains an extensive docket directly relevant...more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

Supreme Court Will Render Landmark Decisions Regarding LGBTQ Protection Under Title VII

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

This fall, the U.S. Supreme Court heard three employment cases that collectively ask: Does Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which prohibits employment discrimination “because of…sex,” encompass discrimination based...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Supreme Court Hears Landmark Cases On Title VII Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity Discrimination

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: On October 8th, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in a trio of cases that may decide whether Title VII prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and gender identity. In much of the...more

Fisher Phillips

Pendulum To Swing Back As SCOTUS Prepares For Exciting 2019-2020 Term

Fisher Phillips on

Taking a three-year look back at the Supreme Court’s workplace law decisions gives you the sense that the exciting cases only come down every other year. In the ho-hum term that ended in 2017, the Court handled relatively...more

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC

Exploring the Origins of Pride Month and Taking Stock of LGBTQ+ Rights

Harris Beach Murtha PLLC on

Across the country each June, communities come together to celebrate Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender and Queer (LGBTQ) Pride Month. This month of events honors the 1969 Stonewall Uprising in Manhattan while also...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Supreme Court Grants Review of Three Title VII Cases Concerning Protections for LGBTQ Workers

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Earlier today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted review of a triad of cases addressing whether Title VII, the federal statute prohibiting certain types of discrimination in employment, prohibits discrimination...more

Butler Snow LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Will Consider Whether LGBT Employees are Protected from Discrimination by Federal Civil Rights Laws

Butler Snow LLP on

The U.S. Supreme Court’s next term will likely have a significant impact on employers. On April 22, 2019, the Court announced that it is taking up the hot-button issue of whether federal laws that ban discrimination in...more

32 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide