News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › LGBTQ › Employment Litigation

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

SCOTUS wraps it up: Four lessons for employers

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

"Reverse discrimination," ADA, religion, and nationwide injunctions. The 2024-25 term of the U.S. Supreme Court is over. Two decisions at the end of the term directly addressed employment law issues, and two others will have...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

New (Old) Battlegrounds: The Administration’s Targeting of Transgender Rights

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Within the last two months, both the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the armed services have followed Trump Administration directives to narrow or eliminate protections for transgender individuals....more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

SCOTUS Argument Recap: Court Appears Likely to Eliminate Heightened Prima Facie Burden for Majority Group Plaintiffs Under Title...

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

In a recent oral argument, the Justices seemed largely aligned with the plaintiff’s position that majority and historically disadvantaged groups should face the same prima facie test under Title VII....more

McAfee & Taft

SCOTUS to weigh in on reverse discrimination claim brought by heterosexual employee

McAfee & Taft on

Last week, the U.S. Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Ames v. Ohio Department of Youth Services, an employment discrimination lawsuit that focused on a reverse discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Expresses Skepticism Over Higher Burden in Majority Discrimination Cases

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

The Supreme Court of the United States recently heard oral arguments in a case to determine whether employees who are part of a majority group must meet a higher standard to prove discrimination....more

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace

President Trump’s Executive Order on Recognizing Two Sexes: Implications for Private Employers

Proskauer - Law and the Workplace on

On Monday, January 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued an Executive Order entitled “Defending Women From Gender Ideology Extremism and Restoring Biological Truth To The Federal Government” (the “Order”).  The Order...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court to Hear Heterosexual Woman’s Reverse Discrimination Case

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

The Supreme Court of the United States has agreed to hear a case in which a female heterosexual employee claimed an Ohio state agency discriminated against her in favor of employees who identify as LGBTQ+. The case, Ames v....more

Littler

Littler Lightbulb – January Employment Appellate Roundup

Littler on

At the Supreme Court - Recovery of Damages for Property Destroyed During a Strike. On January 10, 2023, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Glacier Northwest v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters.  At issue is...more

Fisher Phillips

The Top 20 Non-COVID Workplace Law Stories Of 2020

Fisher Phillips on

That this past year was the most challenging year in your professional life is an almost certainty. You were forced to learn entirely new statutory schemes, absorb new local health directives on a near-daily basis, create a...more

Fisher Phillips

The Top 5 (Non-COVID-19) Developments In Dealership Employment Law

Fisher Phillips on

You have probably seen a lot of coronavirus news alerts lately, but as a car dealer, you already know that germs are not the only things that can cause headaches. Virus or no virus, the law is still going to change and...more

Fisher Phillips

June 2020: The Top 21 Labor And Employment Law Stories

Fisher Phillips on

It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always seems to evolve at a rapid pace, there have been an unprecedented number of changes for the past few years—and this past month...more

Payne & Fears

Key California Employment Law Cases: June 2020

Payne & Fears on

Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, 140 S. Ct. 1731 (2020) - Summary:  Title VII prohibits employers from discriminating against employees on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity....more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 15, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued the following opinions: Bostock v. Clayton County, No. 17-1618; Altitude Express, Inc. v. Zarda, No. 17-1623; R. G. & G. R. Harris Funeral Homes, Inc. v. Equal...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Supreme Court: Title VII Protects LGTBQ+ Employees

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The U.S. Supreme Court has held that LGTBQ+ employees are protected from workplace discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The Court issued its decision in three consolidated cases: Bostock v....more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Employment Law...

SCOTUS Decides Title VII Protects LGBTQ+ Workers

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Employment Law... on

In a historic 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court of the United States held that an employer who discriminates against an employee merely for being gay or transgender violates Title VII. 590 U. S. ____ (2020). This landmark...more

Fox Rothschild LLP

U.S. Supreme Court Prohibits Job Discrimination Based On Sexual Orientation And Gender Identity

Fox Rothschild LLP on

In an historic decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that sexual orientation and gender identity/expression discrimination are prohibited under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. In Bostock v. Clayton County,...more

Roetzel & Andress

Supreme Court Rules LGBTQ Employees Are Protected From Job Discrimination

Roetzel & Andress on

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled on Monday that federal law protects gay, lesbian, and transgender people from discrimination in employment. The case, Bostock v. Clayton County, Georgia, involved Title VII of the Civil Rights Act...more

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP

Title VII Applies To Discrimination Based On LGBT Status, Supreme Court Says

Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP on

In a 6-3 decision written by Justice Neil Gorsuch, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled today that discrimination based on sexual orientation or gender identity is a form of “sex” discrimination prohibited by Title VII. Justice...more

Amundsen Davis LLC

U.S. Supreme Court Issues Landmark Decision Providing Discrimination Protections To LGBTQ Workers

Amundsen Davis LLC on

On June 15, 2020 the United States Supreme Court handed down a momentous decision ruling that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) protects gay and transgender employees from workplace discrimination. The...more

Bricker Graydon LLP

U.S. Supreme Court rules LGBTQ+ employees are protected from employment discrimination under Title VII

Bricker Graydon LLP on

In a landmark decision for LGBTQ+ rights in the United States, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on June 15, 2020, that federal law prohibits employers from discriminating against employees for being gay or transgender....more

Franczek P.C.

U.S. Supreme Court: Title VII Protects LGBTQ Employees From Discrimination

Franczek P.C. on

Today, in Bostock v. Clayton County, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a landmark ruling holding that Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 bars discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation and transgender status in the...more

Polsinelli

U.S. Supreme Court: Title VII Prohibits Discrimination Based on Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity

Polsinelli on

Today, the United States Supreme Court issued its much-anticipated ruling as to whether Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 protects employees from discrimination based on sexual orientation and gender identity. The...more

Rumberger | Kirk

SCOTUS Has Ruled: Federal Civil Rights Law Protects LGBTQ in the Workplace

Rumberger | Kirk on

Employers have long known that gender stereotyping is not allowed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act’s prohibition on discrimination because of sex. ...more

Rumberger | Kirk

The Circuit Court Showdown: Will SCOTUS Say Yay or Nay Under Title VII to LGBT Workplace Discrimination?

Rumberger | Kirk on

Employers have long known that gender stereotyping is not allowed under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act’s prohibition on discrimination because of sex. However, there has been some confusion over whether this prohibition...more

Miles & Stockbridge P.C.

Will SCOTUS Extend LGBTQ Protections Under Title VII?

Miles & Stockbridge P.C. on

On October 8, 2019, the United States Supreme Court heard two oral arguments in three highly anticipated cases centered on the controversial issue of whether sexual orientation and transgender status fall within the protected...more

46 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide