News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Material Misrepresentation › Fraud

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

Federal Fraud: No Harm, No Foul? Supreme Court Says “Not So”

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &... on

On May 22, 2025, the Supreme Court issued a unanimous decision broadening applicability of the federal wire fraud statute. In Kousisis v. United States, the Court held that a defendant may be convicted of wire fraud for...more

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,...

No Harm, Still Foul: Supreme Court Affirms Expansive Reach of Wire Fraud Statute in Kousisis

Pietragallo Gordon Alfano Bosick & Raspanti,... on

In a recent decision upholding the expansive reach of the federal wire fraud statute (18 U.S.C. §1343), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Kousisis v. United States, No. 23-909 (May 22, 2025) that a defendant can be convicted of...more

Morgan Lewis

Federal Court Strikes Massive False Claims Act Verdict Following Landmark Escobar Ruling

Morgan Lewis on

The ruling in Universal Health Services, Inc. v. Escobar "rejects a system of government traps, zaps, and zingers that permits the government to retain the benefit of a substantially conforming good or service but to recover...more

Alston & Bird

Implied False Certification Liability Under the False Claims Act: How the Materiality Standard Offers Protection after Escobar

Alston & Bird on

The False Claims Act (FCA), initially enacted in 1863 during the Civil War, was sponsored by the Lincoln administration to curtail the rampant fraud and excessive profiteering being perpetuated by government contractors, who,...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Materiality Is the New Condition of Payment: The Implied False Certification Theory After Escobar

Troutman Pepper Locke on

The Supreme Court has made it clear that, even at the pleadings stage, relators (or the government) must plead facts to support materiality with plausibility and particularity. For False Claims Act (FCA) defendants who...more

McAfee & Taft

Supreme Court ruling potentially expands false claims liability for healthcare providers

McAfee & Taft on

In a much-anticipated decision, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled recently that the implied false certification theory may form the basis for liability under the False Claims Act (FCA), resolving a split of among the federal...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP

Supreme Court Case Expands False Claims Act Liability

Hinshaw & Culbertson LLP on

Summary of Decision - On June 16, 2016, the United States Supreme Court decided a case which could have significant impact on healthcare providers. In Universal Health Services Inc. v Escobar, the Court expanded...more

King & Spalding

Universal Health Services v. Escobar

King & Spalding on

On Thursday of last week, the Supreme Court for the first time addressed the “implied certification” theory of liability under the False Claims Act. The Court ruled unanimously that the theory is valid in certain...more

Mintz

Supreme Court Adopts Implied False Certification Theory in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar But Imposes...

Mintz on

On June 16, 2016, a unanimous Supreme Court issued its long-awaited decision in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar (“Escobar”). The Court ruled that under certain circumstances the theory of “implied...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Supreme Court Preserves But Significantly Changes “Implied Certification” Theory of False Claims Act Liability

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On June 16, 2016, the Supreme Court issued its opinion (“Op.”) in Universal Health Services v. U.S. ex rel. Escobar (“Escobar”), a case testing the viability and scope of the implied certification theory of False Claims Act...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

"In Escobar, Supreme Court Upholds False Claims Act’s Implied Certification Theory"

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

On June 16, 2016, the U.S. Supreme Court in Universal Health Services v. United States ex rel. Escobar unanimously upheld the implied certification theory of False Claims Act (FCA) liability. The Court ruled that a party can...more

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints

The Supreme Court Adopts Broad Scope of False Claims Act Liability

Mintz - Health Care Viewpoints on

A unanimous Supreme Court issued its long-awaited and closely watched decision today on the scope of the False Claims Act (“FCA”), and the Court affirmed the FCA’s long reach. Universal Health Services, Inc. v. United States...more

Morgan Lewis

US Supreme Court Opines on Implied Certification Theory in Escobar

Morgan Lewis on

The Court’s rejection of the condition of payment analysis and adoption of a rigorous materiality standard represents a significant shift in how courts must analyze FCA cases premised on underlying regulatory or contractual...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide