News & Analysis as of

Supreme Court of the United States › Military Service Members

The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary... more +
The United States Supreme Court is the highest court of the United States and is charged with interpreting federal law, including the United States Constitution. The Court's docket is largely discretionary with only a limited number of cases granted review each term.  The Court is comprised of one chief justice and eight associate justices, who are nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate to hold lifetime positions. less -
Ballard Spahr LLP

New (Old) Battlegrounds: The Administration’s Targeting of Transgender Rights

Ballard Spahr LLP on

Within the last two months, both the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) and the armed services have followed Trump Administration directives to narrow or eliminate protections for transgender individuals....more

Epstein Becker & Green

Definitional Disagreement Among Justices Fractures Partisan Stereotypes - SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

Yesterday, the U.S. Supreme Court again decided only a single case, that of Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, and, to many Court observers, the most interesting thing about it is the lineup of Justices—one that...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Feliciano v. Department of Transportation

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On April 30, 2025, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Feliciano v. Department of Transportation, No. 23-861, holding that federally employed military reservists called to active duty during wartime or a national emergency are...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - April 30, 2025

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On Tuesday, April 29, the Supreme Court of the United States issued one decision: Advocate Christ Medical Center v. Kennedy, No. 23-715: This case addresses the proper method for calculating the “disproportionate share...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

Belay that Order!  Supreme Court To Relook FAA’s Denial of Differential Pay to Coast Guard Reservist

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

On June 24, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Feliciano v. Department Of Transportation. The Supreme Court will review the Federal Circuit’s decision affirming the Merit Systems Protection Board’s...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 24, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States granted certiorari in seven cases: United States v. Skrmetti, No. 23-477: This case concerns the constitutionality of state laws banning gender-affirming medical care for...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - April 17, 2024

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

The Supreme Court of the United States issued two decisions on Tuesday, April 16: Rudisill v. McDonough, No. 22-888: This case concerns the interaction between two federal statutes providing up to 36 months of...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Rudisill v. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On April 16, 2024, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Rudisill v. McDonough, Secretary of Veterans Affairs, No. 22-888, holding that servicemembers who, through separate periods of service, accrue educational benefits under both...more

Akerman LLP - HR Defense

A Reminder of Employer Obligations to Service Members

Akerman LLP - HR Defense on

A recent U.S. Supreme Court decision serves as a reminder that employers must not overlook their obligations to reemploy returning service members and accommodate service-related disabilities....more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

Supreme Court Holds State Employers Can Be Sued for Discriminating Against Veteran Employees Under USERRA

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

On June 29, 2022, the Supreme Court of the United States decided that a veteran could sue his former employer, the Texas Department of Public Safety (DPS), under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act...more

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP

State Agencies Not Immune From Federal Uniformed Services Employment And Reemployment Rights Act Claims

Kohrman Jackson & Krantz LLP on

In a 5-4 decision, the United States Supreme Court held state agencies are not immune from claims brought under the Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act (USERRA) in the case Torres v. Texas Department of...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - June 29, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Oklahoma v. Castro-Huerta, No. 21-429: This case involves whether a State has authority to prosecute non-Indians who commit crimes against Indians in “Indian country.” The defendant was convicted in Oklahoma state court of...more

Epstein Becker & Green

A Divided Court Rules Against States in Veterans’ Employment and Indian Country Criminal Jurisdiction Cases: SCOTUS Today

Epstein Becker & Green on

With his retirement to begin on June 30 at noon, Justice Breyer leads a 5-4 split in Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, with the Chief Justice and Justice Kavanaugh, along with Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, joining...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

Supreme Court Decides Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP on

On June 29, 2022, the U.S. Supreme Court decided Torres v. Texas Department of Public Safety, No. 20-603. The Court held that a State may not invoke sovereign immunity as a legal defense to block a civil lawsuit filed against...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - January 13, 2022

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

National Federation of Independent Businesses v. Department of Labor, Nos. 21-244, 21-247: Numerous challenges were brought against the emergency rule issued on November 5, 2021, by the Occupational Safety and Health...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court - December 10, 2020

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Rutledge v. Pharmaceutical Care Management Assn., No. 18-540: Arkansas’ Act 900 regulates the price at which pharmacy benefit managers (“PBMs”) reimburse pharmacies for the cost of drugs covered by prescription-drug plans....more

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC

All Consuming - Financial Litigation Insights: Issue 3, July 2020

Spilman Thomas & Battle, PLLC on

Welcome! Welcome to the new format of All Consuming . We listened to the feedback. A newsletter filled with long articles gives the detailed information some are looking for but becomes another thing that others have to...more

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP

Step by Step: Employee Benefits in the Supreme Court

Eversheds Sutherland (US) LLP on

In conjunction with the start of the Supreme Court’s new term, Eversheds Sutherland took a look back at the Court’s work in employee benefit cases since the enactment of ERISA. We found an astonishing 128 decisions, spanning...more

18 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide