News & Analysis as of

Securities Act of 1933 Scienter

The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better... more +
The Securities Act of 1933 is a United States federal statute enacted in response to the stock market crash of 1929 and the ensuing Great Depression. The Act has two primary purposes: 1) to give investors better access to material information prior to investing 2) ensure that transactions are not based on fraud. In order to effectuate its dual goals, the Act requires that any offer or sale of securities is registered with the SEC. less -
A&O Shearman

Northern District Of California Grants Motion To Dismiss In Securities Class Action Against Footwear Company

A&O Shearman on

On June 23, 2025, Judge Araceli Martínez-Olguín of the Northern District of California granted a motion to dismiss a consolidated securities class action brought against a footwear and apparel company (the “Company”) and...more

A&O Shearman

Colorado District Court Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Software Company For Failing To Adequately Allege Scienter Or...

A&O Shearman on

On April 4, 2025, Judge Gordon P. Gallagher of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado dismissed with prejudice a putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Act of 1933 and the...more

A&O Shearman

Eastern District Of New York Grants In Part And Denies In Part Motion To Dismiss Against Manufacturer Of Security Devices

A&O Shearman on

On April 11, 2025, Judge Brian M. Cogan of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss a putative class action alleging violations of Sections...more

A&O Shearman

The Ninth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Claims Against Hearing Aid Manufacturer Regarding Statements About Insurance Coverage

A&O Shearman on

On January 10, 2025, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit Court affirmed the dismissal of a putative securities class action brought by a pension plan alleging that a hearing aid manufacturer (the...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Dismisses Securities Act Claims As Untimely And Pares Claims In Putative Class Action Against...

A&O Shearman on

On November 4, 2024, Judge Denise L. Cote of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss a putative class action brought under Sections 10b-5...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Narrows Claims In Putative Class Action Against China Based Real Estate Brokerage Company

A&O Shearman on

On February 26, 2024, Judge Gregory H. Woods of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York narrowed claims in a putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Permits Putative Class Action Against Ride Hailing Company To Proceed

A&O Shearman on

On March 14, 2024, Judge Lewis Kaplan of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York denied defendants’ motions to dismiss a putative class action against a China-based ride hailing company, certain...more

Jones Day

2023 Securities Litigation Year in Review

Jones Day on

During 2023, securities lawsuit filings rose for the first time in four years. Settlements declined last year; there were nine mega-settlements of more than $100 million, including a $1 billion settlement. Case filings...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Dismisses Putative Class Action Against Media Company For Failure To Adequately Allege...

A&O Shearman on

On February 5, 2024, Judge Valerie Caproni of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissed with prejudice a putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Act of 1933 against a...more

Allen Matkins

Does The Securities Exchange Act Of 1934 Preclude Actions In State Court Under Corporations Code Section 25401?

Allen Matkins on

Section 25401 of the California Corporations Code declares generally declares unlawful to make false statements of a material fact or or omit material facts when buying or selling a security.  It is therefore similar to Rule...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

Securities Act Claims Dismissed as Time-Barred and Otherwise Insufficient

Freiberger Haber LLP on

On March 20, 2018, the United States Supreme Court decided Cyan, Inc. v. Beaver County Employees Retirement Fund, in which it unanimously held that the Securities Litigation Uniform Standards Act of 1998 does not strip state...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Grants Software Company’s Motion To Dismiss In Proposed Investor Class Action

A&O Shearman on

On June 2, 2023, Judge Denise Cote of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York granted a motion to dismiss a proposed class action against a software company (the “Company”), alleging violations...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

The Supreme Court Update - June 1, 2023

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

Today, the Supreme Court of the United States issued three decisions: Glacier Northwest, Inc. v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters Local Union, No. 174, No. 21-1449: This case involved the preemptive force of...more

Allen Matkins

What's Misleading About "Leading"?

Allen Matkins on

In this post yesterday, John Jenkins took aim at issuer's that characterize themselves as "leading".  He notes that the SEC Staff has and continues to comment on such characterizations.  I think that in some cases these...more

A&O Shearman

Southern District Of New York Pares Claims In Putative Class Action Against Telecommunications Company

A&O Shearman on

On March 25, 2022, Judge Mary Kay Vyskocil of the Southern District of New York granted in part and denied in part a motion to dismiss a putative class action asserting claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 against...more

A&O Shearman

District Of Connecticut, On Remand, Denies Motion To Dismiss Putative Class Action Against Consumer Financial Services Company

A&O Shearman on

On February 11, 2022, the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut denied a motion to dismiss a putative securities class action asserting claims under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”)...more

A&O Shearman

District of Utah Dismisses A Putative Class Action Alleging Market Manipulation In Connection With The Issuance Of A Digital...

A&O Shearman on

On September 28, 2020, Judge Dale A. Kimball of the United States District Court for the District of Utah granted a motion to dismiss a putative securities fraud class action asserting violations of Section 10(b) and 20(a) of...more

Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP

The SEC’s Efforts Against Public Companies & Corporate Officers Continue

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton has repeatedly touted his focus on “Main Street.” In doing so, he unleashed the Division of Enforcement’s Asset Management specialty unit on the investment advisory industry and finalized and...more

Allen Matkins

Woodbridge Trustee Seeks Relief In California's Corporate Securities Law

Allen Matkins on

On Monday, the trustee of the Woodbridge Liquidation Trust filed a lawsuit against numerous law firms and lawyers. The trustee's lawsuit relates to the reportedly $1.3 billion Ponzi scheme allegedly orchestrated by Robert H....more

A&O Shearman

Middle District Of Tennessee Pares Claims In Putative Class Action Against Healthcare Company And Its Previous Owner

A&O Shearman on

On November 19, 2019, Judge William M. Campbell of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee granted in part and denied in part motions to dismiss a putative class action under the Securities Act...more

A&O Shearman

Fifth Circuit Affirms Dismissal Of Class Action Against Pipeline Operator For Failure To Adequately Allege Misstatements Or...

A&O Shearman on

On July 16, 2019, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit affirmed a decision by the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas that dismissed a putative class action against the oil and...more

Allen Matkins

Court Rules No Scienter Required

Allen Matkins on

Both Corporations Code Section 25401 and Rule 10b-5 concern securities fraud. Section 25401, however, was modeled on Section 12(2) (now 12(a)(2)) of the Securities Act of 1933 while Section 10b-5 was adopted under Section...more

A&O Shearman

Supreme Court Hears Argument On "Scheme Liability" Under Section 10(b) And Rule 10b-5

A&O Shearman on

On December 3, 2018, the Supreme Court heard argument on an appeal in a case where a divided panel of the D.C. Circuit held that a defendant who did not “make” a misstatement within the meaning of Janus Capital Group v. First...more

Allen Matkins

Court Finds Section 12(a) Claim Fails For Failure To Plead Scienter?

Allen Matkins on

I recently covered liability under Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 in the securities regulation course that I teaching at the University of California, Irvine School of Law. Thus, I was interested to read a...more

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC

Chris Lazarini Discusses Ruling of Summary Judgment on Issue of Scienter

Bass, Berry & Sims PLC on

Bass, Berry & Sims attorney Chris Lazarini discussed a case brought by the SEC against an individual broker accused of violations of Section 17(A) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act...more

30 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide