News & Analysis as of

Standing › Telecommunications › The United States Federal Communications Commission

Troutman Amin LLP

DEAR LORD: Nomorobo Just Sued Synchrony Under the TCPA For Calls to a Honeypot And This Could Be Enormous

Troutman Amin LLP on

Honeypots. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands of phone numbers owned by a single corporate subscriber. They exist merely to monitor and track calling patterns. No one is using these phones. They are monitored autonomously for a...more

Shipkevich PLLC

Mid-Year TCPA Roundup: Navigating Recent Legislative and Litigation Developments

Shipkevich PLLC on

The Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) landscape continues to evolve as new legislation is implemented and courts across various jurisdictions grapple with complex issues regarding standing, agency, and consent. This...more

Shipkevich PLLC

2022 TCPA Recent Recap — Litigation Updates & Regulatory Round Up

Shipkevich PLLC on

September 2022 Action Clarifies Only Random Calls Trigger TCPA Violations — Not Mere Use of An Autodialer - Mehl v. Green, et al. 2022 WL 4056269 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 2, 2022) - A law firm was recently sued after one of its...more

Carlton Fields

No Speaking? No Standing!

Carlton Fields on

On November 15, the Eleventh Circuit decided Cordoba v. DirecTV, LLC, further exploring the issue of when class actions achieve Article III standing. The plaintiffs alleged that DirecTV and the company with which it...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

ATDS Appellate Watchdog: TCPA Autodialer Cases Pending in the Circuit Courts of Appeals You Can’t Miss Post-Marks

Womble Bond Dickinson on

This week, Erin Kubota prognosticated how the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals will decide automatic telephone dialer cases (“ATDS”) post the monumental Marks ruling from the Ninth Circuit on September 20, 2018...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Prognosticating Post Marks: Will Courts in Other Jurisdictions Follow in the 9th Circuit’s Footsteps on the Definition of an ATDS...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

We clearly do not have a crystal ball here in TCPAland, otherwise we would have been able to accurately predict the Ninth Circuit’s monumental recent decision in Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC, 2018 WL 4495553 (9th Cir. Sept....more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Split in New Jersey: Court Finds Predictive Dialers not covered by the TCPA– Contrary to Earlier Rulings by Different Judge In...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Welcome to Splitsville. As courts continue to address the definition of automated telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) within the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) it was only a matter of time before we started...more

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,...

Ninth Circuit Weighs in on Prior Express Consent and Revocation of Consent

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,... on

The Ninth Circuit recently weighed in on the limitations of prior express consent and revocation under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (the “TCPA”). In Van Patten v. Vertical Fitness Group, LLC, the consumer provided...more

8 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide