News & Analysis as of

Standing Telecommunications Robocalling

Troutman Amin LLP

DEAR LORD: Nomorobo Just Sued Synchrony Under the TCPA For Calls to a Honeypot And This Could Be Enormous

Troutman Amin LLP on

Honeypots. Tens (hundreds?) of thousands of phone numbers owned by a single corporate subscriber. They exist merely to monitor and track calling patterns. No one is using these phones. They are monitored autonomously for a...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Speak for Yourself: Court Denies Class Certification in TCPA Case Based on Class Members’ Potentially Mixed Reactions to Ringless...

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On January 18, a court in the Eastern District of Wisconsin denied class certification in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) case concluding that the factual issue of whether the proposed class members had suffered an...more

Carlton Fields

Robocalling into Florida: A Dicey Gamble in an Evolving Legal Landscape

Carlton Fields on

No one likes receiving telemarketing calls or text messages from strangers. That’s one reason Congress enacted the Telephone Consumer Protection Act more than 30 years ago. Initially designed, in part, to combat the scourge...more

Carlton Fields

How Courts Are Deciding Standing In Fla. Robocall Cases

Carlton Fields on

There is a continuing question regarding Article III standing for cases brought under the federal Telephone Consumer Protection Act in Florida. To give the very quick recap: In 2019, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the...more

Shipkevich PLLC

2022 TCPA Recent Recap — Litigation Updates & Regulatory Round Up

Shipkevich PLLC on

September 2022 Action Clarifies Only Random Calls Trigger TCPA Violations — Not Mere Use of An Autodialer - Mehl v. Green, et al. 2022 WL 4056269 (E.D. Cal. Sept. 2, 2022) - A law firm was recently sued after one of its...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Petition for En Banc Review Filed in the Eleventh Circuit Following Pivotal TCPA Standing Suit

Womble Bond Dickinson on

As we previously reported, the Eleventh Circuit recently held that receiving a single, unsolicited text message does not constitute the harm necessary to achieve Article III standing in a Telephone Consumer Protection Act...more

Smith Debnam Narron Drake Saintsing & Myers,...

District Court Rules Telemarketer’s Single Unanswered Call Creates Article III Standing

A single missed call from a telemarketer constitutes a concrete injury that gives rise to standing, a federal district court in California has ruled. In Shuckett v. DialAmerica Marketing, Inc., 2019 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 29598...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

ATDS Appellate Watchdog: TCPA Autodialer Cases Pending in the Circuit Courts of Appeals You Can’t Miss Post-Marks

Womble Bond Dickinson on

This week, Erin Kubota prognosticated how the United States Circuit Courts of Appeals will decide automatic telephone dialer cases (“ATDS”) post the monumental Marks ruling from the Ninth Circuit on September 20, 2018...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Prognosticating Post Marks: Will Courts in Other Jurisdictions Follow in the 9th Circuit’s Footsteps on the Definition of an ATDS...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

We clearly do not have a crystal ball here in TCPAland, otherwise we would have been able to accurately predict the Ninth Circuit’s monumental recent decision in Marks v. Crunch San Diego, LLC, 2018 WL 4495553 (9th Cir. Sept....more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Split in New Jersey: Court Finds Predictive Dialers not covered by the TCPA– Contrary to Earlier Rulings by Different Judge In...

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Welcome to Splitsville. As courts continue to address the definition of automated telephone dialing system (“ATDS”) within the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) it was only a matter of time before we started...more

Robins Kaplan LLP

Van Patten V. Vertical Fitness Is No TCPA Killer

Robins Kaplan LLP on

The rise of Telephone Consumer Protection Act litigation in the past decade has been staggering. From just 14 cases in 2007, the number of TCPA-related filings has exploded to 4,860 in 2016 — a total that is expected to...more

Carlton Fields

TCPA Class Certified Based Largely on “Concrete Injury” Determination

Carlton Fields on

Following the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Spokeo Inc. v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1549 (2016) – which held that Article III standing requires a concrete injury, even when an injury has otherwise been established...more

Burr & Forman

Southern District of California Holds Charge for Incoming Call Does Not Create Standing to Assert TCPA Claim

Burr & Forman on

Plaintiff filed suit, placing at issue a single call to his cell phone using an ATDS, and attempting to represent a class of similarly situated individuals. The only allegation in the Complaint arguably relating to injury was...more

13 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide