News & Analysis as of

State Constitutions Eminent Domain Property Owners

Roetzel & Andress

Ohio Court Affirms Eminent Domain Taking for Downtown Zanesville Redevelopment Project

Roetzel & Andress on

The Ohio and U.S. Constitutions require that the power of eminent domain can only be exercised when necessary for a public use. In the 2005 case of Kelo v. City of New London, the U.S. Supreme Court took an expansive view...more

Oliva Gibbs

A river ran through it: State v. Riemer and what happens to the mineral rights when the water runs dry

Oliva Gibbs on

Lake Meredith is a reservoir located about 30 miles northeast of Amarillo in the Texas Panhandle. It was formed when the State of Texas built the Sanford Dam on the Canadian River in 1965. When the dam was completed the...more

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL

Court Scrutinizes “Public Use” in Gas Utility Condemnation

Last week, a court called into question whether a condemnation by a gas utility was for a “public use,” even though the take was initiated by an entity that had the statutory authority to enter, condemn and appropriate land....more

Bricker Graydon LLP

The basics of acquiring property through eminent domain in Ohio

Bricker Graydon LLP on

Public entities are often faced with the challenging issue of acquiring property for construction projects. Acquiring property can be a lengthy process depending on property owners’ disposition with regard to selling...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide