News & Analysis as of

Statute of Limitations › Foreclosure

Statute of Limitations refers to a statute that sets the time period during which a legal claim can be brought. Most statute of limitations laws require individuals to sue at some point during a set period... more +
Statute of Limitations refers to a statute that sets the time period during which a legal claim can be brought. Most statute of limitations laws require individuals to sue at some point during a set period usually commencing from the date of the wrong or injury or the discovery of the wrong or injury. Except for under a limited set of circumstances, if an individual does not file a suit within the specified time period, the law bars them from ever suing on that claim. less -
Troutman Pepper Locke

New York Court of Appeals to Review FAPA’s Constitutionality and Retroactive Application

Troutman Pepper Locke on

As a follow up to our May post, FAPA in the Spotlight Again: Second Circuit Renews Call for NY Court of Appeals Review, the New York Court of Appeals has finally agreed to consider New York’s Foreclosure Abuse Prevention...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads

Recent Cases Offer Instruction for Lenders on Avoiding FAPA Estoppel in Foreclosure or Quiet Title Actions in New York

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads on

Under the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (“FAPA”), effective as of December 30, 2022, a lender in a New York foreclosure or quiet title action can be estopped from asserting that the subject mortgage loan was not validly...more

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP

New York Court of Appeals Finally Agrees to Hear Constitutional Challenges to FAPA

Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP on

After years of denying review, the New York Court of Appeals — the state’s highest court — agreed to address the question of whether New York’s momentous Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) applies retroactively. On May...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads

New York Court of Appeals Accepts Certified Questions on Whether FAPA Should be Retroactively Applied

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads on

The New York Court of Appeals has finally agreed to consider whether retroactive application of the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (“FAPA”) (or sections of it) violates the New York Constitution. Over the last two years,...more

Goodwin

New York’s Highest Court Agrees To Hear Constitutional Challenge to Estoppel Provision of FAPA

Goodwin on

On May 20, 2025, the New York Court of Appeals agreed to hear constitutional challenges to one aspect of New York’s Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA). ...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Firmly Fixated With Allonges - REF News & Views

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

In a recent decision by the Supreme Court of the State of New York in Kings County (the Court), HSBC Bank USA, N.A. (the Plaintiff) initiated a mortgage foreclosure action against Jack and Sabah Srugo (collectively, the...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

RPAPL 1501(4) and the Mortgagee in Possession Doctrine

Freiberger Haber LLP on

Today’s article addresses a property owner’s right to cancel a recorded mortgage pursuant to RPAPL 1501(4)[1] and whether a mortgagee is “is entitled to recover sums expended to preserve and maintain an allegedly abandoned...more

Goodwin

Portions of New York’s FAPA Survive Constitutional Challenges

Goodwin on

Over the last four months, New York’s Appellate Division has finally begun to address constitutional challenges to the state’s Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA), an act that became effective in December 2022 and...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Litigation Byte (December Edition)

McGlinchey Stafford on

Delivered in digestible, insightful bites, McGlinchey’s Litigation Byte is a monthly roundup of financial services decisions and cases nationwide that impact your business....more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

All Along the Watchtower: Awaiting the Ruling on FAPA’s Retroactive Reach

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

In a recent case, E. Fork Funding LLC v. U.S. Bank, Nat’l Ass’n, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has certified a novel question for the New York Court of Appeals ("NYCOA"): Whether Sections 4 and/or...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Let the Statute of Limitations Run and You Might Be “SOL...”

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

HSBC Bank, U.S. v. De Garcia considers the reach of the newly enacted Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act (FAPA) and its effects on the six-year foreclosure statute of limitations....more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Sovereign Immunity and the New York Statute of Limitations

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

Patricia Reid (Defendant) obtained a mortgage from BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P. (BAC) for certain real property located in Queens, New York. In March, 2010, BAC accelerated the debt and initiated a foreclosure action. The...more

Freiberger Haber LLP

The Appellate Division, Second Department, Holds that Banking Law 6-l is a Personal Defense that Can Only be asserted by the...

Freiberger Haber LLP on

By: Jonathan H. Freiberger As readers of this BLOG know, we frequently write about issues relating to mortgage foreclosure. We have also written numerous articles relating to the recently enacted FAPA... ...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

Stay Just a Little Bit Longer: Not Jackson Browne but the Statute of Limitations

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

The Second Department recently held  in Trento 67, LLC v. OneWest Bank, N.A., et. al  that the FHA COVID-19 moratorium constituted a stay of foreclosures for federally-backed mortgages, and thus tolled the statute of...more

Morrison & Foerster LLP

Scrivener’s Error in Guaranty Reformed Outside of Statute of Limitations and Held Enforceable

Morrison & Foerster LLP on

In an appeal heard by the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the First Judicial Department of New York, the Court recently ruled that a court may reform a guaranty after the statute of limitations for a reformation of...more

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads

The Texas Supreme Court Has Spoken: Mortgage Servicers May Rewind and Restart the Statute of Limitations Clock Within the Same...

Hinshaw & Culbertson - Consumer Crossroads on

Last week, the Texas Supreme Court answered the Fifth Circuit’s certified question as to whether simultaneous rescission and reacceleration can reset the limitations period under Texas Law by holding that “a rescission that...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Am I Entitled to a Bonus? - McGlinchey Commercial Law Bulletin - February 16, 2024

McGlinchey Stafford on

Ohio- Enforceability of Arbitration Agreement- Bryan Costin v. Midwest Vision Partners LLC., 8th Dist. Cuyahoga No. 112651, 2024-Ohio-463. The Eighth District Court of Appeals recently affirmed the trial court’s ruling...more

Miller Canfield

Michigan Property Owners Entitled to Surplus Value When Foreclosed Property Transferred to Land Bank, Court of Appeals Rules

Miller Canfield on

Miller Canfield previously reported on Rafaeli, LLC v Oakland County (Rafaeli), in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that counties are not allowed to retain sale proceeds that exceed the taxes owed on a foreclosure...more

Goodwin

New York Courts Split on the Constitutionality of the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act

Goodwin on

In the six months since New York’s governor signed the Foreclosure Abuse Prevention Act, L. 2022, ch. 821 (eff. Dec. 30, 2022) (FAPA), a split has emerged about whether the law applies retroactively....more

McGlinchey Stafford

Can I Recover Fees Under an Offer of Judgment Even if I Lose on Appeal? - McGlinchey Commercial Law Bulletin - June 22 2023

McGlinchey Stafford on

Marchbanks v. Ice House Ventures, LLC, Slip. Op. No. 2023-Ohio-1866. In this discretionary appeal, the Ohio Supreme Court reversed the appellate court’s ruling, finding that an enforceable settlement agreement existed,...more

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP

6th Circuit: Tennessee judicial foreclosure time-barred

Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP on

On May 4, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit affirmed a lower court’s decision in a judicial foreclosure action, holding that a bank’s lawsuit was barred by Tennessee’s 10-year statute of limitations for actions...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

CFPB Issues Guidance to Protect Homeowners from Zombie Mortgages

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

On April 26, 2023, the CFPB issued an advisory opinion, which reiterated that the FDCPA and Regulation F prohibit certain debt collectors from suing to collect on debt or threatening to foreclose on homes with mortgages past...more

Shipkevich PLLC

CFPB Issues Advisory Opinion on Debt Collection Practices

Shipkevich PLLC on

On April 26, 2023, the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) released an advisory opinion to clarify that it is against the law for a debt collector to sue or threaten to sue in order to collect a time-barred debt, as...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Federal District Court Dismisses Plaintiff’s FDCPA and FCCPA Action as Time-Barred — Holds Subsequent Filings Made in Foreclosure...

Troutman Pepper Locke on

A federal district court in the Middle District of Florida recently dismissed a pro se plaintiff’s Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and Florida Consumer Collection Practices Act (FCCPA) action as time-barred because...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Is My FDCPA Claim Timely? - McGlinchey Commercial Law Bulletin - March 14, 2023

McGlinchey Stafford on

Ohio- Statute of Limitations Under FDCPA- Bouye v. Bruce, 6th Cir. Nos. 21-6195/22-5016 (Mar. 1, 2023). In this appeal, the Sixth Circuit reversed in part the district court’s decision, finding that a claim brought...more

179 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 8
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide