News & Analysis as of

Statute of Limitations › Supreme Court of the United States › Corporate Counsel

Statute of Limitations refers to a statute that sets the time period during which a legal claim can be brought. Most statute of limitations laws require individuals to sue at some point during a set period... more +
Statute of Limitations refers to a statute that sets the time period during which a legal claim can be brought. Most statute of limitations laws require individuals to sue at some point during a set period usually commencing from the date of the wrong or injury or the discovery of the wrong or injury. Except for under a limited set of circumstances, if an individual does not file a suit within the specified time period, the law bars them from ever suing on that claim. less -
Fisher Phillips

SCOTUS Ruling Expands Path for Plaintiffs to Revive Dismissed Lawsuits: What Employers Need to Know

Fisher Phillips on

A new Supreme Court decision just made it easier for employees to revive lawsuits they voluntarily dismissed – in some cases, even after the statute of limitations has expired. In Waetzig v. Halliburton Energy Services, the...more

Mintz

A New Age of Agency Rulemaking and Enforcement

Mintz on

As we prepare for the next Supreme Court term, we’d like to look back at some of the most significant opinions from the last session and their potential impact on corporate regulation. Of the dozens of opinions issued by the...more

Carlton Fields

Classified Monthly: A Roundup of Class Action Decisions From Federal Appellate Courts June 2024

Carlton Fields on

The Roundup covers notable class action decisions each month from federal appellate courts, as well as notable Supreme Court class action cert petitions....more

Fisher Phillips

Labor Board Rules in Jeopardy in the Post-Chevron Era: What Employers Need to Know

Fisher Phillips on

The Supreme Court’s recent landmark ruling that gives employers a powerful tool to fight back against regulatory overreach will have a broad impact on just about every area of workplace law. We’re looking at the specific...more

Fisher Phillips

Yet Another SCOTUS Decision Will Allow Employers to Challenge Federal Regulations More Easily: 5 Steps to Plan for the New Future

Fisher Phillips on

All eyes were on the Supreme Court’s decision to overturn a decades-old legal doctrine and redefine the balance of power between federal agencies and courts, but the Court also snuck in another ruling that will allow...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

SCOTUS Oral Argument Suggests SEC Disgorgement Will Survive—But Might Be Limited To Victim Compensation

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

Seyfarth Synopsis: On Tuesday, March 3, 2020, the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in Liu et al v. Securities and Exchange Commission, in what some thought would be a landmark case on the SEC’s power to seek disgorgement...more

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &...

Supreme Court Seems Poised to Limit But Not Eliminate SEC Disgorgement in Judicial Proceedings

Foley Hoag LLP - White Collar Law &... on

On Tuesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Liu v. SEC, which concerns whether, or to what extent, the SEC may ask courts to disgorge defendants’ ill-gotten gains. As I discussed in a previous post, disgorgement...more

Fisher Phillips

SCOTUS ERISA Ruling May Open Floodgates For Increased Lawsuits

Fisher Phillips on

In a unanimous decision, the Supreme Court just declined to limit the timeframe in which disgruntled employees could bring suit challenging the investment decisions made by plan fiduciaries. While the Employee Retirement...more

Morgan Lewis - ML Benefits

US Supreme Court Will Hear Three ERISA Cases This Fall

Morgan Lewis - ML Benefits on

After more than two years without one, three ERISA cases will come before the US Supreme Court in 2019–2020. Exciting times for ERISA attorneys, to be sure, but each case also presents issues of practical consequence for plan...more

Littler

Supreme Court Year in Review: Union Agency Fees, Travel Restrictions, and the Retirement of Justice Kennedy

Littler on

The U.S. Supreme Court closed out its most recent term, which began in October 2017, with a number of high-profile and ground-breaking decisions. ...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Supreme Court Rules That Pending Class Actions Do Not Toll Limitations Period for Subsequent Class Actions

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In China Agritech v. Resh, No. 17-432 (June 11, 2018), the U.S. Supreme Court held yesterday that a pending class action does not toll the statute of limitations for absent class members who bring a subsequent class action....more

Foley & Lardner LLP

Will The Supreme Court Allow Class Action Stacking?

Foley & Lardner LLP on

Parties have long argued over whether the filing of a class action tolls the statute of limitations for absent class members so that they can pursue a separate class action if the initial action fails to be certified for any...more

Fisher Phillips

Web Exclusive: January 2018: The Top 18 Labor And Employment Law Stories

Fisher Phillips on

It’s hard to keep up with all the recent changes to labor and employment law. While the law always seems to evolve at a rapid pace, there were an unprecedented number of changes each month in 2017—and if January is any...more

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

2017-18 Supreme Court Update

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP on

In the 2017-18 term, the U.S. Supreme Court will decide a number of potentially significant disputes relevant to businesses, including those involving constitutional protections, class actions and other corporate liability...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Supreme Court Agrees to Decide Whether Statute of Limitations Bars Successive Class Actions

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In China Agritech, Inc. v. Resh, the U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to decide an important and recurring class action issue that has divided the courts of appeals—does the tolling of the statute of limitations for class...more

Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist

This Week in FCPA-Episode 56

Thomas Fox - Compliance Evangelist on

This week, Jay and I have a wide-ranging discussion on some of the week’s top compliance related stories. We discuss: 1. The Kokesh case at the US Supreme Court is significant for SEC enforcement of the FCPA around profit...more

Lathrop GPM

Laches No Longer a Defense to Pre-Suit Damages in Patent Infringement Cases

Lathrop GPM on

On March 21, 2017, the U.S. Supreme Court, in a highly anticipated 7-1 decision, held that laches cannot be invoked as a defense against damages for patent infringement occurring within the six-year damages limitation period...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

The Supreme Court May Review Whether Regulatory Enforcement Actions Seeking Disgorgement are Subject to a Five-Year Statute of...

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP on

Federal regulatory agencies, such as the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”), and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), have the authority to impose...more

Franczek P.C.

A Review of the Supreme Court’s 2015 - 2016 Term

Franczek P.C. on

Last week, the Supreme Court ended its 2015-2016 session under a cloud of uncertainty. On February 22, 2016, Justice Antonin Scalia, the stalwart of the Court’s conservative wing for 30 years, passed away. Justice Scalia’s...more

Dickinson Wright

U.S. Supreme Court Holds that Resignation Triggers the Limitations Period for Constructive Discharge Claims

Dickinson Wright on

The United States Supreme Court resolved a split among appellate circuits about when an employee must take action to pursue a constructive discharge claim. The Court held that the 45-day limitation period for a federal civil...more

Jackson Lewis P.C.

Supreme Court: Constructive Discharge Limitations Period Begins with Notice of Resignation

Jackson Lewis P.C. on

The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that the statute of limitations for an employee’s Title VII constructive discharge claim begins on the date of the employee’s notice of resignation. Green v. Brennan, No. 14-613 (May 23,...more

Littler

Supreme Court Clarifies the Time Period for Initiating Constructive Discharge Claims

Littler on

On May 23, 2016, the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Green v. Brennan, holding that the statute of limitations for a constructive discharge claim begins to run at the time the employee resigns. While the...more

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,...

SCOTUS Rules: Notice of Resignation Starts the Clock in a Federal Employee’s Constructive Discharge Case

Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart,... on

On May 23, 2016, the Supreme Court of the United States decided when the limitations period for filing a lawsuit begins to run for a federal employee claiming he or she resigned—or was “constructively discharged”—due to...more

Foley & Lardner LLP

En Banc Federal Circuit Preserves The Patent Laches Defense Over Dissent

Foley & Lardner LLP on

In a divided en banc decision in SCA Hygiene Products v. First Quality Baby Products, the Federal Circuit preserved the defense of laches for patent cases even though the Supreme Court eliminated that defense in copyright...more

WilmerHale

Supreme Court Strengthens False Claims Act’s Statute of Limitations, Narrows First-to-File Bar

WilmerHale on

The U.S. Supreme Court recently resolved two important questions under the False Claims Act (FCA), holding that (1) the Wartime Suspension of Limitations Act (WSLA), 18 U.S.C. § 3287, applies only to criminal cases, and (2)...more

29 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2
Next »

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide