News & Analysis as of

Statutory Interpretation Cell Phones Telemarketing

Troutman Amin LLP

THE DEATH OF PRESUMPTION: Are Cell Phones Still “Residential” Post McLaughlin?

Troutman Amin LLP on

The TCPA landscape is being reshaped in real time and we’re here to bear witness. With the Supreme Court’s decision in McLaughlin Chiropractic Assocs. v. McKesson Corp., No. 23-1226, 2025 U.S. LEXIS 2385 (June 20, 2025), the...more

Hogan Lovells

Eleventh Cir. Rejects Broad Reading of “Autodialer”

Hogan Lovells on

On January 27, 2020, an Eleventh Circuit panel released a landmark ruling in Glasser v. Hilton Grand Vacations Company, LLC. The key issue in the case was how to interpret ambiguous language in the Telephone Consumer...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

Too Creative By Half: Court Rejects Argument that TCPA “Landline” Prohibitions Apply to “Residential Cell Phones”

Womble Bond Dickinson on

In TCPAland wonders never cease. The latest entrant into our museum of TCPA curiosity is the Plaintiff who contends his cell phone is a landline because he uses it for residential purposes. This curious fellow believes he...more

Womble Bond Dickinson

First-in-the-Nation TCPA Result: Court Holds Direct Dropped Voicemails are Covered by the TCPA

Womble Bond Dickinson on

Despite Jay Edelson’s pronouncement this week that there is no new ground to till in TCPAland, a court this week just issued yet another first-in-the-nation ruling and it could have a big impact on users of so-called “direct...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide