News & Analysis as of

Statutory Interpretation Consumer Lenders

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Ninth Circuit Revives Washington Consumer Protection Claims over “HomeOwner Agreement”

On August 7, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed a district court’s dismissal of a putative class action alleging violations of the Washington Consumer Protection Act (WCPA) against a company offering a...more

Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer

Supreme Court Issues Its Decision in Hopcraft Motor Finance Commission Appeal

In what was a significant decision for the automotive industry, the Supreme Court has allowed the lenders' appeal in part in its much-anticipated judgment relating to lender liability for the payment of third-party broker...more

Hudson Cook, LLP

No Harm, No Foul: Statutory Violations and Consumer Harm

Hudson Cook, LLP on

"No harm, no foul" is a common saying. As it turns out, that saying is sometimes true in law. An important prerequisite for a lawsuit in federal court is that the plaintiff have standing to sue....more

David Shirk - Shirk Law

Why Ginnie Mae Issuers are Challenging VA Seasoning Buyout Demands and Why Lenders Care

David Shirk - Shirk Law on

Issuers should be aware that Ginnie Mae interpreting its MBS guide in a manner that departs from VA circular 26-19-22, and the plain reading of statutory language with respect to the beginning and ending dates used to...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide