News & Analysis as of

Technology Sector › Alice/Mayo

Proskauer - The Patent Playbook

The Uncertain Future of Section 101: Patent Eligibility in the Wake of Recent Supreme Court (In)Action

Proskauer - The Patent Playbook on

Patent eligibility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 remains one of the most hotly contested and unpredictable areas of U.S. patent law. In the years following the Supreme Court’s landmark decisions in Alice Corp. v. CLS Bank Int’l...more

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL

Intellectual Property Law in the Age of Generative AI

Keating Muething & Klekamp PLL on

The recent surge of accessible generative AI (“GenAI”) tools has kept attorneys, particularly those in the intellectual property, technology, data privacy, and cybersecurity spaces, on their toes. Within the intellectual...more

Knobbe Martens

Tying Claimed Technological Advancements to Specific Technological Methods Is a Winning POV on Patent Eligibility

Knobbe Martens on

Before Reyna, Prost, and Schall. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. Summary: Claims are patent-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101 where the written description discloses...more

ArentFox Schiff

USPTO Issues Updated AI Subject Matter Eligibility Guidance

ArentFox Schiff on

The US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) recently issued its 2024 Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility and July 2024 Subject Matter Eligibility Examples. This latest update builds on the 2019 Guidance by providing...more

Knobbe Martens

Relying on Computer-Implemented, Result-Focused Functional Language Is a Bad Bet

Knobbe Martens on

Before Dyk, Prost, and Stark. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. Summary: Recitations of a computer-implemented method can be an abstract idea and non-eligible under 35 U.S.C. § 101...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Alice Step 2 May be Satisfied by a Patent’s Description and use of Claimed Technology

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP on

Allegations in a complaint may be insufficient to raise a factual dispute under Step 2 of Alice when a patent’s specification contradicts those allegations by using the claimed technology in a way that demonstrates a person...more

6 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide