News & Analysis as of

Toxic Exposure Summary Judgment Jurisdiction

Goldberg Segalla

Manufacturer’s Motion for Summary Judgment on Personal Jurisdiction Denied

Goldberg Segalla on

Jurisdiction: Schenectady Supreme Court, New York - Defendant Fives Giddings & Lewis were sued in New York by plaintiff McCune, based on the allegation that their machinery exposed him to asbestos. Mr. McCune filed this...more

Husch Blackwell LLP

Texas Court Upholds Summary Judgment in Silica Case

Husch Blackwell LLP on

The Texas Fourteenth Court of Appeals upheld summary judgment for Exxon Mobil corporation in Stanley Cole v. Exxon Mobil Corp. (No. 14-22-00756-CV), a premises liability case involving alleged exposure to olivine dust. The...more

Goldberg Segalla

First Department Affirms New York Jurisdiction Over Automotive Defendants

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: Supreme Court, Appellate Division, First Department (NY) - In this asbestos action, plaintiffs allege that decedent, John Beagan, was exposed to asbestos-containing products while in work areas of New York car...more

Goldberg Segalla

Case Remanded to California State Court; Plaintiff Awarded Motion Costs and Fees

Goldberg Segalla on

Court: United States District Court for the Northern District of California - In this asbestos action, plaintiff Gary Haeck sued several defendants for causes of action in strict products liability, negligence, fraud, and...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide