News & Analysis as of

Trademark Application › Patent Applications › Lanham Act

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.

Filings Up, Pendency Down – USPTO 2024 Year in Review (& Early Thoughts for 2025)

Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C. on

With 2024 now in the rearview mirror, it’s a great time to take a look at the past year’s U.S. trademark prosecution and examination numbers – and consider where the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”) may be heading...more

Dorsey & Whitney LLP

Attorneys May Be Expensive, But Are Their Fees “Expenses”?

Dorsey & Whitney LLP on

On March 4, 2019, the Supreme Court agreed to hear Iancu v. NantKwest, Inc., which will determine whether unsuccessful applicants before the United States Patent and Trademark Office who elect to challenge adverse decisions...more

Jones Day

Win or Lose: Appellants of PTO Decisions in District Court Must Pay Attorneys' Fees

Jones Day on

On June 23, 2017, the Federal Circuit held in NantKwest v. Matal that patent applicants seeking review of a decision from the United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") to the district court must pay the PTO's legal...more

3 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide