News & Analysis as of

Trademark Infringement › Likelihood of Confusion › Online Advertisements

Mayer Brown

Online Advertisements and Trade Mark Infringement – Singapore Court of Appeal Issues a Landmark Decision

Mayer Brown on

The Singapore Court of Appeal's decision in East Coast Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd v Family Podiatry Centre Pte Ltd [2025] SGCA 28 ("East Coast Podiatry") marks a significant development in Singapore's trade mark jurisprudence,...more

Goodwin

Second Circuit Sees Eye to Eye With Warby Parker in Trademark Google Ads Dispute

Goodwin on

While it has become common practice to bid on or purchase a competitor’s trademark to use as a search engine keyword, there remains some confusion about when such practices create liability for trademark infringement....more

Knobbe Martens

Amazon’s clear labelling defeats MTM trademark claims

Knobbe Martens on

The US Supreme Court has denied certiorari for the Ninth Circuit decision in Multi Time Machine Inc (MTM) v Amazon.com Inc on February 29 2016, which held that Amazon did not infringe MTM’s trademark in its presentation of...more

Bennett Jones LLP

Use of Competitors’ Trademarks as Google AdWords is not Infringement

Bennett Jones LLP on

The British Columbia Supreme Court has decided that the use of a competitor’s trademarks in Google AdWords does not constitute infringement. In Vancouver Community College v Vancouver Career College (Burnaby) Inc.,...more

4 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
Sign up Log in
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide