News & Analysis as of

Trademark Litigation Canada

Smart & Biggar

What the Canuck?! Understanding scandalous, obscene and immoral marks in Canada

Smart & Biggar on

“Scandalous, obscene or immoral” trademarks are not only unregistrable in Canada, but they are also unlawful to adopt in connection with a business “as a trademark or otherwise.” While similar prohibitions have been deemed...more

International Lawyers Network

Trademark Opposition Proceedings in Canada: Proposed Changes Now in Place

In July 2024, I discussed proposed changes to trademark proceedings in Canada. Following a public consultation period, revised Regulations came into force on April 1, 2024 that incorporate those proposed changes. The changes...more

Smart & Biggar

Upcoming changes to Canada’s trademarks regime: what brand owners and their counsel need to know

Smart & Biggar on

On April 1, 2025, long-awaited amendments to Canada’s Trademarks Act and Trademarks Regulations will come into force. The purpose of the amendments is to discourage abuse of Canada’s trademarks regime and to improve the...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Marques de commerce : Des preuves d’emploi désormais exigées sous peine de radiation

Le registraire des marques de commerce (le « registraire ») peut désormais exiger des propriétaires de marques de commerce déposées auprès de l’Office de la propriété intellectuelle du Canada qu’ils présentent des preuves...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian IP litigation 2024: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

In 2024, we witnessed several notable developments in Canadian IP litigation. These included the Supreme Court granting leave for an appeal on the patentability of methods of medical treatment, a successful patent invalidity...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian trademark law 2024: a year in review

Smart & Biggar on

In this article, we review a number of notable Canadian trademark cases from 2024 and highlight key developments in Canadian trademarks practice. On February 5, 2025, join us for an insightful webinar as we deliver a roundup...more

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Prove It or Lose It: Trademark Registrar Initiates Proof-of-Use Proceedings

The Registrar of Trademarks (Registrar) can now request that owners of trademarks registered with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office (CIPO) submit proof of use of certain trademarks or face expungement of those marks...more

Smart & Biggar

[Webinar] Canadian trademark law 2024: a year in review - February 5th, 12:00 pm - 1:00 pm ET

Smart & Biggar on

Join us for an insightful session as our presenters Pelle Berends, Tierney G.B. Deluzio, Meika Ellis and Kwan T. Loh deliver a roundup of Canadian trademark law, highlighting some of the most important new cases and practice...more

Seyfarth Shaw LLP

U.S. Isn’t Everything – The Importance for U.S. Entities to Obtain Trademark Protection Abroad (Yes, that includes Canada)

Seyfarth Shaw LLP on

The author of the lyrics for Canada’s national anthem, “O Canada,” probably didn’t have trademarks in mind when he wrote “we stand on guard for thee.” But a recent trademark infringement win for a Maryland-based U.S....more

Bennett Jones LLP

Kissing Registration Goodbye: Deficient Online Survey Evidence Cannot Save Application for SWISSKISS

Bennett Jones LLP on

Survey evidence can be used in trademark disputes to establish consumer perception and brand power. A recent Federal Court decision provides guidance on factors that may influence the admissibility of online survey evidence....more

Smart & Biggar

Interlocutory injunctions: powerful tools for trademark owners in Canada

Smart & Biggar on

A recent Canadian decision illustrates how powerful interlocutory injunctions can be for trademark owners involved in trademark infringement litigation in Canada. On January 2, 2024, in Amer Sports Canada Inc v Adidas Canada...more

Smart & Biggar

BYOOVIZ is confusing with BEOVU: Federal Court finds violation of Novartis’ trademark rights

Smart & Biggar on

In a decision dated January 24, 2024, Justice Pallotta allowed Novartis’ application, finding that Biogen and Samsung’s use of the trademark BYOOVIZ in association with an ophthalmologic drug violates Novartis’ rights in its...more

Smart & Biggar

False alarm: the risks of groundless online takedown complaints

Smart & Biggar on

Online takedowns are an essential and effective tool for intellectual property rightsholders. Such tools are a common response to infringement on online marketplaces. A recent Canadian decision highlights the risks associated...more

Smart & Biggar

Five New Year resolutions for trademark owners in 2024

Smart & Biggar on

Trying some healthy habits in 2024? Your trademarks want you to do the same! A trademark has value when it is distinct and enforceable. Even registered marks can lose value if proper “trademark hygiene” is not followed...more

Smart & Biggar

Trademark protection in Canada: Pursuing Canadian designations under the Madrid Protocol

Smart & Biggar on

Canada has emerged as a popular jurisdiction for trademark designations under the Madrid Protocol, a global system facilitating streamlined protection of marks across multiple countries. According to WIPO’s Madrid Yearly...more

Smart & Biggar

[Ongoing Program] Contentious trademark proceedings: What brand owners should know about defending and enforcing their rights in...

Smart & Biggar on

This spring, join our Smart & Biggar trademark experts and gain new insights at our popular Canadian Trademarks webinar series. Each webinar provides practical tips and strategies for global brand protection in Canada, with a...more

Smart & Biggar

Failed second bite at the cherry (pie): Federal Court invalidates foreign-language marks filed in bad faith

Smart & Biggar on

The Federal Court recently had occasion to revisit the issue of confusion between foreign-language trademarks involving the use of Chinese characters in Canada. ...more

Smart & Biggar

Canadian Trademark Law 2022: Year in Review

Smart & Biggar on

The proverbial brand owner’s guidebook became a little bigger in 2022. Developments in practice opened new avenues for securing and enforcing trademark rights over the past year, including an “accelerated” path to trademark...more

Smart & Biggar

Trademarks in 2020: Notable Canadian trademark cases and developments

Smart & Biggar on

There were several notable trademark cases in Canada in 2020, including those addressing comparative advertising, depreciation of goodwill, brand parody, trademark ‘use’ in the absence of a brick-and-mortar location, and...more

International Lawyers Network

Businesses Beware: Depreciation in Goodwill Claims Not Bound By Industry Lines

The Federal Court of Canada (the “FCTD“) recently released Toys “R” Us (Canada) Ltd v Herbs “R” Us Wellness Society, in which it considered whether a cannabis company, Herbs “R” Us Wellness Society (“Herbs R Us“), had...more

Smart & Biggar

Whether or not there’s a will, there’s still a way to infringers’ profits in Canadian trademark litigation

Smart & Biggar on

Late last month, in a landmark decision heralded by brand owners, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Romag Fasteners, Inc v Fossil Group, Inc that a plaintiff in a trademark infringement suit is not required to show that a...more

Smart & Biggar

5 reasons why Canada is an attractive jurisdiction for trademark litigation

Smart & Biggar on

Brand owners looking to enforce their rights expeditiously (and inexpensively) need look no further than Canada, which offers brand owners a number of tools to obtain relief against infringers and counterfeiters in a...more

Smart & Biggar

Effectively using experts in IP Litigation – Part 1: Theory

Smart & Biggar on

In IP litigation, expert testimony is common and important. Experts may provide the court with a scientific primer in highly complex cases. In patent litigation, experts may construe complex claims through the eyes of a...more

Smart & Biggar

PC v. PC. Pampered Chef Succeeds in Trademark Infringement Battle

Smart & Biggar on

On July 22, 2019, the Federal Court issued its decision in Loblaws Inc v Columbia Insurance Company, 2019 FC 961. Pampered Chef, a Berkshire Hathaway company and a world-leader in the sale of premium kitchenware products, has...more

Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P.

Food & Beverage Litigation Update | October 2017 #4

Furans in Baby Food May Pose Health Risk, EFSA Reports - The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) has issued an assessment of the risks of furans and related compounds 2- and 3-methylfurans, concluding that they pose a...more

34 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 2

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide