News & Analysis as of

True Lender State and Local Government

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

FDIC Withdraws Support for Colorado’s Opt-Out Law Before Tenth Circuit

On February 26, the FDIC withdrew its amicus brief in the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals challenging Colorado’s 2023 opt-out law which aimed to restricting higher-cost online lending. The FDIC’s decision follows a shift in the...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Bank Partnership Moves to Dismiss Class Action Asserting Violations of Georgia Rate Cap Law

On January 29, a Missouri-based bank and its Kansas-based fintech loan servicer filed a joint motion to dismiss a purported class action filed against them alleging violations of the Georgia Installment Loan Act (GILA) and...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Washington D.C. Introduced Rate Exportation Opt-Out and “Anti-Evasion” Bill

On November 30, Washington D.C. introduced District of Columbia Council Bill B 25-0609, which would opt the state out of Section 521 of the Depository Institutions Deregulation and Monetary Control Act of 1980 (“DIDMCA”) with...more

Troutman Pepper Locke

Florida Senator Introduces Bill Regulating Bank Model Lending and Loan Programs Based on Voluntary Tips

Troutman Pepper Locke on

On October 9, a Florida state senator introduced SB 146, which would add a new section to the Florida Consumer Finance Act (CFA), attempting to curb evasion of the CFA. SB 146 would treat all payments incident to the loan as...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

FinTech Prevails in Texas “True Lender” Challenge

On January 11, 2023, a Texas federal court dismissed a class action lawsuit against a leading financial technology company alleging it violated Texas usury laws by charging interest on loans it made through a partnership with...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Fintech Flips Script, Sues California Regulator Over 36% Rate Cap Law

On March 7, a Chicago-based FinTech company  filed a Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in Los Angeles County Superior Court against the Commissioner of the California Department of Financial Protection and...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

OCC Prevails in Challenge to “Valid When Made” Rule

On February 8, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California ruled against three states – California, Illinois, and New York – challenging the OCC’s rule on the “valid when made” doctrine. In 2020, the OCC...more

Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP

Hawaii Amends Small Dollar Lending Law

Hawaii recently enacted HB 1192, which amends the state’s small dollar lending law by setting forth a new licensing requirement for “installment lenders” and specifies various consumer protection requirements.  The...more

McGlinchey Stafford

Another “unfathomable” decision: Colorado loans not valid when made

McGlinchey Stafford on

On June 9, 2020, the Colorado District Court issued an order stating that federal interest rate exportation authority under Section 27 of the Federal Depository Insurance Act does not extend to non-bank entities that purchase...more

Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP

2019 Year in Review: Securitization Litigation and Regulation

There were significant developments in 2019 as courts continued to issue important decisions in this space and significant legislation impacting the residential mortgage-backed securities (“RMBS”) market came into effect.  A...more

Ballard Spahr LLP

Update on Colorado bank-model lawsuits

Ballard Spahr LLP on

In two closely-watched enforcement actions pending in Colorado state court, the Administrator of the Uniform Consumer Credit Code for the State of Colorado is employing the “true lender” theory and the Second Circuit’s...more

11 Results
 / 
View per page
Page: of 1

"My best business intelligence, in one easy email…"

Your first step to building a free, personalized, morning email brief covering pertinent authors and topics on JD Supra:
*By using the service, you signify your acceptance of JD Supra's Privacy Policy.
- hide
- hide